@article{Kryvda_2021, title={“UKRAINE’S GLORY HAS NOT YET DIED, NOR HER FREEDOM HAS” (TO THE QUESTION OF THE UKRAINIAN STATEHOOD “RENAISSANCE”)}, url={https://dumka.philosophy.ua/index.php/fd/article/view/547}, DOI={10.15407/fd2021.03.079}, abstractNote={<p><span style="font-size: 10.0pt; font-family: ’NewtonC’,serif;">The problem of the "revival" (renaissance) of the Ukrainian statehood has been </span><span style="font-size: 9.0pt; font-family: ’NewtonC’,serif;">the focus of attention for centuries. On the other hand, Ukrainian intellectual discourse has not been able formulate an integral and consolidated image of the past. </span><span style="font-size: 9.0pt; font-family: ’NewtonC’,serif;">A significant obstacle on this path was the state policy of memory of an ad hoc nature, which was built through a combination of Soviet and Ukrainian approaches to the interpretation of the past. </span><span style="font-size: 9.0pt; font-family: ’NewtonC’,serif;">The lack of a unifying historical narrative, the regionalization of history interpretations of Ukraine have fueled interpersonal and interregional hostility within Ukrainian society for decades. </span><span style="font-size: 9.0pt; font-family: ’NewtonC’,serif;">It has become a fertile ground for the humanitarian aggression of neighboring countries, aimed at desubjectivation of Ukraine through destruction of historical foundations of statehood in public consciousness of the Ukrainians themselves. The points of their spokesmen are reinforced by arguments of the conservative pro-Ukrainian historians, who, trying to consider the history of Ukrainian statehood in the context of general civilization development, have devel- oped the thesis of “non-historical” Ukrainian nation due to interruption of national existence in the sixteenth and eighteenth centuries. </span><span style="font-size: 9.0pt; font-family: ’NewtonC’,serif;">This approach, as shown in the article, was important for raising attention of global com- munity to the Ukrainian issue in the second half of the twentieth century, even though it did not reflect the real case. After all, even at the time of strengthening of assimilation policy on the part of neighboring states, Ukrainians did not have the interruption of national existence and contin- ued to cultivate diverse ideas of "revival" and development of their own statehood. </span><span style="font-size: 9.0pt; font-family: ’NewtonC’,serif;">Such desire was especially evident in the seventeenth century due to active position of the Cossacks, who managed to wield influence on all segments of Ukrainian population, raising it to an armed struggle for their own freedom and statehood. </span><span style="font-size: 9.0pt; font-family: ’NewtonC’,serif;">The inability of the Cossacks to fully implement the tasks gave rise to notes of pessimism in the minds of Ukrainians, whose faith in the revival of their own statehood faded away, but never waned at all. </span><span style="font-size: 9.0pt; font-family: ’NewtonC’,serif;">Cherishing the former Cossack greatness, Ukrainians, contrary to the assimilationist policy of the ruling nations or stratums, have always found the strength to speak out reminding themselves and the world that “Ukraine`s glory has not died, nor her freedom”, and therefore they will defend their own statehood. </span></p>}, number={3}, journal={Filosofska Dumka}, author={Kryvda, Nataliia}, year={2021}, month={Sep.}, pages={79–91} }