The state of emergency and the limits of the concept of the political: socio-philosophical analysis

  • Dmytro Shevchuk
Keywords: state of emergency, the concept of the political, political world, legitimacy

Abstract

The article is aimed at the analysis of “the state of emergency” phenomenon, its essence and influence on the order of political world and determination of the political limits. The author investigates the problem of permanence as a feature of the state of emergency that is singled out by modern political philosophers, such as W. Benjamin, H. Marcuse, G. Agamben, M. Hardt and A. Negri et al. Such understanding of the state of emergency is the manifestation of the political world’s crisis and the crisis of political philosophy. The socio-philosophical analysis of these problems can be the precondition for re-interpretation of categories used for politics understanding. The state of emergency is examined in the article in different aspects of its manifestations and conceptual comprehensions. From the anthropological point of view, the author tries to define this phenomenon as a way of “cosmogonical” overcoming of the chaos, the strengthening of world order, and means of returning to the usual symbolic and imaginary order. From the phenomenological point of view the state of emergency manifests itself as “chinks” and “cracks” of political world. The author pays attention to the questions of legitimacy of Sovereign in the situation of the state of emergency and abnormal sociality created by such situation; he believes that the analysis of these questions gives a possibility to understand the essence of state of emergency better.

References

Баландьє Ж. Політична антропологія. — К.: Альтерпрес, 2002. — 252 с.

Беньямін В. Про поняття історії // Беньямін В. Вибране. — Львів: Літопис, 2002. — С. 39—52.

Вебер М. Три чисті типи легітимного панування // Вебер М. Соціологія. Загальноісторичні аналізи. Політика. — К.: Основи, 1998. — С. 157—172.

Лакло Э. Невозможность общества // Логос. — № 4—5. — 2003. — С. 54—57.

Маркузе Г. Одномерный человек. — M.: REFL-book, 1994. — 368 c.

Руссо Ж.-Ж. Про суспільну угоду, або принципи політичного права. — К: Port-Royal, 2001. — 349 с.

Хардт М., Негри A. Империя. — М.: Праксис, 2004. — 440 с.

Шмитт К. Политическая теология: Сборник. — М.: КАНОН-пресс-Ц, 2000. — 336 с.

Шмитт К. Понятие политического // Вопросы социологии. — 1992. — № 1. — С. 35—67.

Agamben G. Homo sacer. Sovereign Power and Bare Life. — Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1998. — 199 p.

Agamben G. Wyjątkowy stan. — Kraków: Korporacja Halart, 2008. — 282 s.

Benjamin W. Critique of Violence // Benjamin W. Selected Writings. — Vol. 1. 1913—1926. — Harvard: Harvard University Press, 2003. — P. 236—252.

The Agamben Effect / Ed. Alison Ross. — Durham: Duke University Press, 2008. — 212 p.

Virilio P. Speed and Politics. — New York: Semiotext(e), 2007. — 174 p.

Žižek S. How to read Lacan. — New York, London: W.W.Norton & Company, 2007. — 132 p.
Published
2017-05-12
How to Cite
Shevchuk, D. (2017). The state of emergency and the limits of the concept of the political: socio-philosophical analysis. Filosofska Dumka, (2), 82-92. Retrieved from https://dumka.philosophy.ua/index.php/fd/article/view/211