Reconstruction of Charles William Morris’ criticism of Ludwig von Bertalanffy’s project of General System Theory
Keywords:
unity of science, general system theory, semiotic, philosophy, scientific empiricismAbstract
In 1937 at the Charles William Morris’ philosophical seminar at the University of Chicago, Ludwig von Bertalanffy, the Austrian philosopher and biologist, red the lecture on the project of General System Theory that had to solve the problem of the unity of science. Morris criticized the Bertalanffy’s project and Bertalanffy had to delay the development of the project almost for a decade. The author of the article contemplates to reconstruct the Morris’ criticism of the Bertalanffy’s project of the General System Theory. The author analyzes Bertalanffy’s work “Significance and the Unity of Science” and shows that Bertalanffy introduced that the General System Theory goal was to define general prin ciples of the systems of all sciences to set homology between them. The author analyzes Morris’ work “Philosophy of Science and Science of Philosophy” and shows that Morris understood philosophies, sciences and arts as languages and thought that only philosophy as scientific empiricism, semiotic being its main component, could solve the problem of the unity of science. The author shows that the Morris’ basic argument against the Bertalanffy’s project could be that according to Morris the General System Theory was a simple language like logic or mathematics but not a meta-language that only could solve the problem of the unity of science.
References
Bertalanffy L. von. General System Theory — а Critical Review // General Systems. — 1962. — Vol. VII. — P. 1—20.
Bertalanffy L. von. General System Theory: Foundations. Development. Application: Revised 17th Edition. — New York: George Braziller, 2009. — XXIV+296 p.
Bertalanffy L. von. Kritische Theorie der Formbildung. — Berlin: Gebrü der Borntraeger, 1928. — 243 S.
Bertalanffy L. von. Modern Theories of Development: an Introduction to Theoretical Biology.— Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1933. — 204 p.
Bertalanffy L. von. Theoretische Biologie. — Bd. 1: Allgemeine Theorie, Psysikochemia, Aufbau und Entwicklung des Organismus. — Berlin: Gebrü der Borntraeger, 1932. — 350 S.
Bertalanffy L. von. Zu einer allgemeinen Systemlehre // Deutsche Zeitschrift für Philosophie. — Bd. 18. — 1945. — № 3—4.
Bertalanffy L. von. Zu einer allgemeinen Systemlehre // Biologia Generalis. — 1949. — № XIX. — S. 114—129.
Brauckmann S. Eine Theorie für Lebendes? Die Synthetische Antwort Ludwig von Berta lanffys, doctoral thesis. — Frankfurt am Main; Munich; New York: University of Münster; Hansel-Hohenhausen, 2000.
Carnap R. The Unity of Science (Key Texts) [Facsimile] / M. Black (Introduction and trans lation). — London: Thoemmes Press, 1997. — 101 p.
Hartmann M. Biologie und Philosophie. — Berlin: J.Springer, 1925. — 53 S.
Morris Ch. Foundations of the Theory of Signs // International Encyclopedia of Unified Scien ce / Ed. by O. Neurath, R. Carnap, Ch. Morris. — Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 1938. — Vol. 1. — № 6—10. — P. 77—138.
Morris Ch. Philosophy of Science and Science of Philosophy // Philosophy of Science. — 1935. — Vol. 2. — № 3. — P. 271—286.
Morris Ch. Signification and Significance: A Study of the Relations of Signs and Values. — Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press, 1968. — 99 p.
Morris Ch.W. Symbolism and Reality: A Study in the Nature of Mind. — Amsterdam; Philadelphia: John Benjamins Pub Co., 1992. — 128 p.
Neurath O. The Unity of Science as a Task // Neurath O. Philosophical Papers 1913—1946: With a Bibliography of Neurath in English / Ed. by R.C. Cohen, M. Neurath. — Dordrecht: D. Reidel Publishing Company, 1983. — P. 115—120.
Pouvreau D. La «tragédie dialectique du concept de totalité»: Une biographie non officielle de Ludwig von Bertalanffy (1901—1972) d’après ses textes, sa correspondance et ses archives. — Vienne: BCSSS, 2006. — 100 р.
Reinke J. Einleitung in der theoretischen Biologie. — Berlin: Paetel, 1901. — 640 S.
Schaxel J. Grundzüge der Theoriebildung in der Biologie. — Jena: Gustav Fischer, 1919. — 200 S.
Uexküll J. von. Theoretische Biologie. — Berlin: Paetel, 1920. — 253 S.
Woodger J.H. Biological Principles: a Critical Study. — London: K. Paul, Trench, Trubner; New York: Harcourt, Brace, 1929. — XII+498 p.
Downloads
-
PDF (Українська)
Downloads: 205
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).