Was Kant a naive pacifist? (philosophical considerations and the background of the russian-ukrainian war)
Keywords:
Kant, project of eternal peace, war, republicanism, federalism, cosmopolitan citizenship, hospitality, spirit of trade, pacifism, theory of democratic peace, Russian-Ukrainian warAbstract
The article is devoted to I. Kant's views on the problem of war and peace and the possibility of achieving "perpetual peace" on the basis of the pamphlet "To Eternal Peace" and some other late works of the thinker. In particular, attention is paid to the historical background of the appearance of the work as a certain completion of moral philosophy and philosophy of law in the context of developing one's own project of "eternal peace" taking into account the solution of specific problems of foreign policy at the end of the 18th century. The article examines a kind of Kantian "formula of peace", which claims universal significance. It is laid out in the preliminary and especially in the definitive articles of the imaginary contract. It is argued that it is based on three main principles: republicanism, federalism and the presence of a cosmopolitan citizenship limited to hospitality. These principles are complemented by the so-called "guarantees" of "perpetual peace": the progress of law and the spirit of international trade. The article analyzes apologetic and critical responses to Kant's work and its subsequent interpretations in European philosophy and political thought. In particular, special attention is paid to the interpretation of his work as a "pacifist manifesto". Based on this, it was argued that Kant was one of the founders of secular pacifism. The article reasonably refutes such a position on the basis of its anachronism and inconsistency with the views of Kant himself, who considered "eternal peace" only as a higher normative ideal of foreign policy. The influence of Kantian ideas on the formation of modern philosophy of international relations, in particular the theory of democratic peace (DPT), is indicated. It is indicated that the three main principles of Kant's formula of "eternal peace" found their embodiment in the postulates of this theory. At the same time, it is noted that the practice of implementing DPT in US foreign policy has not always had positive consequences. In this regard, the problem of its application to the analysis of the causes and course of the Russian-Ukrainian war is analyzed. There are different positions on this matter, but based on the latest publications and the real course of events. It is concluded that the "militant" version of DPT can be useful for achieving our victory and a just, fair and worthy peace.
References
Bann Seng Tan. (2024). The revenge of ‘democratic peace’. International Political Science Review, 45(2), 149–169. Retrieved from: https://www.citedrive.com/en/discovery/the-revenge-of-democratic-peace/#google_vignette
D'Anieri, P. (interview). (2017). Democratic Peace – or War? Paul D'Anieri Assesses the Russia-Ukraine Conflict. HURI, Harvard University. Retrieved from: https://huri.harvard.edu/news/democratic-peace-or-war-paul-danieri-assesses-russia-ukraine-conflict
Datsiuk, S. (2018). Perpetual peace. [In Ukrainian]. Ukrayinska Pravda, August 28. Retrieved from: https://blogs.pravda.com.ua/authors/datsuk/5b84e9a6d8fb6/
Denysenko, N., Shchyrytsia, T. (2022). Actualization of the concept of eternal peace in the context of civilizational development of mankind in the conditions of war. [In Ukrainian]. Bulletin of the Lviv University. Series: Philos. and Political Scientist. Studies, 44, 30–40. Retrieved from: http://fps-visnyk.lnu.lviv.ua/archive/45_2022/3.pdf
Dosenrode, S. (Ed.). (1998). Danske EUropavisioner. Århus: Systime.
Doyle, М. (1983). Kant, Liberal Legacies and Foreign Affairs. Parts 1, 2. Philosophy and Public Affairs, 12(3), 205–235; l2(4), 323–353. Retrieved from: http://www.jstor.org/stable/2265298
Flikschuh, K., Ypi, L. (2014). Kant and Colonialism: Historical and Critical Perspectives. Oxford University Press.
Fukuyama, F. (2022). Preparing for Defeat. American purpose, 10 Marсh. Retrieved from: https://www.americanpurpose.com/blog/fukuyama/preparing-for-defeat/
Gentz, F. von. (1989). Über den ewigen Frieden. In: A. Dietze, W. Dietze (Eds.), Ewiger Friede? Dokumente einer deutschen Diskussion um 1800 (SS. 377–391). Leipzig, Weimar: Kiepenheimer.
Höffe, O. (2022). Krieg in der Ukraine: Der Traum vom ewigen Frieden ist geplatzt. Aber das zeigt vielleicht nur, dass wir nicht verstanden haben, was Friede ist. NZZ, 4 April. Retrieved from: https://www.nzz.ch/feuilleton/ukraine-krieg-kants-traum-vom-ewigen-frieden-ist-nicht-geplatzt-ld.1677445?reduced=true
Höfe, O. (2022a). Why does peace prevail? [In Ukrainian]. Philosophical Thought, 3, 111–114.
Kant, I. (1914). Metaphysik der Sitten. In: I. Kant, Gesammelte Schriften. Herausgegeben von der Königlich Preußischen Akademie der Wissenschaften (Bd. VI, SS. 203–493). Berlin: de Gruyter.
Kant, I. (1923). Zum ewigen Frieden. Ein philosophischer Entwurf. In: I. Kant, Gesammelte Schriften. Herausgegeben von der Königlich Preußischen Akademie der Wissenschaften (Bd. VIII, SS. 341–386). Berlin: de Gruyter.
Krause, J. (2013). Kant und seine Zeit – die Schrift „Zum ewigen Frieden“ vor der Hintergrund der Französischen Revolution und der nachfolgenden Kriege. In: Kant’s Project of Perpetual Peace in the Context of Contemporary Politics: Proceedings of International Seminar (SS. 9–23). IKBFU Press.
Minakov, M. (2019). Modernity and Peace. Lessons of Kant's Applied Enlightenment. [In Ukrainian]. Ukraina Moderna, 26, 99–117. Retrieved from: http://publications.lnu.edu.ua/journals/index.php/uamoderna/article/view/1103 Rand, A. (1961). For the New Intellectual. New York: Penguin.
Rummel, R. J. (1981). Understanding Conflict and War. Vol. 1: The Dynamic Psychological Field. New York.
Russett, B. (1993). Grasping the Democratic Peace; Principles for a Post-Cold War World. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Skavron, B. (2024). The Russian governor called the German philosopher Kant the culprit of the war in Ukraine. [In Ukrainian]. Retrieved from: https://tsn.ua/svit/rosiyskiy-gubernator-nazvav-vinuvatcem-viyni-v-ukrayini-nimeckogo-filosofa-kanta-2511835.html
Taranenko, A. (2022). Democratic peace theory for Russia-Ukraine war analysis. Scientific Journal of the National Pedagogical Dragomanov University. Series 22. Political Sciences and Teaching Methodology of Socio-Political Disciplines, 32, 63–80. Retrieved from: https://enpuir.npu.edu.ua/handle/123456789/41020
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
