THE SPACE HETEROGENEITY PROBLEM: THE CONCEPT OF HETEROTOPIA
YOUNG SCIENTIST'S PAGE
Keywords:
heterotopia, heterotopology, space, spatial turn, phenomenology, philosophical topography, relations, emplacementAbstract
The article attempts to actualize the spatial dimension of human existence, namely the phenomenon of heterotopia which became popular in the world at the end of the 20th century for rethinking modern network connections, performativity in culture, the new dominant mode of space, the mode of emplacement (l'emplacement), being on the frontier, inter- and transdisciplinary research. A brief review of the history of the concept of space suggests that the spatial aspect of human life was largely ignored in medieval and modern times. With the help of social topology and philosophical topography, which uses the phenomenological method, it becomes clear that contemporary cities are saturated with contradictory meanings that can be combined in heterotopias. Cities are complex topical formations with a huge number of highly charged places. In cities, we encounter a particularly pronounced element of heterotopias, which can be more or less tangible. Thus, heterotopias become “counter-locations”, a kind of utopia that has been realized. In them, everything real that people encounter is imagined, presented, questioned, and turned upside down. Six principles of heterotopias are given, outlining their essence. The example of several popular heterotopias demonstrates the need for a new approach to work with space in Ukrainian society, to its rethinking. Modern trends in many areas of life manifest this extraordinary relevance of the spatial issue, which, in our opinion, is best demonstrated in the phenomenon of juxtaposing several places in one space. Malls and the subway are such places of the greatest demonstrativeness of the essence of heterotopia in modern urban life. The subway has acquired special importance with the beginning of the full-scale invasion. As a result, these heterotopias reflect a defining ambiguity. On the one hand, we can agree with Foucault that heterotopias reflect the crisis (previously mainly deviant) nature of social relations, on the other hand, such a nature is already an integral part of social life in the 21st century.
References
Aristotle. (1991). Physics: Book IV. Princeton.
Bachelard, G. (1994). The Poetics of Space (Trans. by M. Jolas). Boston: Beacon Press.
Dehaene, M., De Cauter, L. (Eds.). (2008). Heterotopia and the City. Public Space in a Postcivil Society. Routledge: Taylor & Francis Group.
Jameson, F. (2003). Future City. New Left Review, 21/3, 65–79.
Kolinko M. (2018). Topos as a Concept of Social Topology. Multiversum. Philosophical almanac (3–4), 32–44.
Koolhaas, R. (2002). Junkspace. October, 100, 175–190.
Lefebvre, H. (1991). The Production of Space (Trans. by D. Nicholson-Smith). Oxford & Cambridge: Blackwell.
Lefebvre, H. (1996). Writings on Cities (Ed. by E. Kofman, E. Lebas). Oxford, Malden: Blackwell Publishers.
Malpas, J. (1999). Place and Experience: A Philosophical Topography. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Malpas, J. (s.a.). Thinking Topographically: Place, Space, and Geography. Retrieved from: https://jeffmalpas.com/wp-content/uploads/Thinking-Topographically-Place-Space-and-Geogr.pdf
Movable Space: anthology. (2018). Kyiv: Medusa.
Nora, P. (1989). Between Memory and History: Les Lieux de Mémoire. Representations, 26, 7–24.
Plato. (1892). Timaeus. In: The Dialogues (Trans. by B. Jowett) (vol. 3, pp. 339–517). S.l.
Prykhodko, V. (2017). Conceptualization of Spatial Turn in Philosophizing: «Structuralist Epokhe», «Existential Geography», «Topographical Methodology». Humanity Studies, (29), 123–131.
Soja, E.W. (1996). Thirdspace: Journeys to Los Angeles and Other Real-and-Imagined Places. Malden, MA: Blackwell.
Waldenfels, B. (2002/2004). The Topography of an Alien: Studies in the Phenomenology of an Alien. Kyiv: PPS.
Weber, M. (1996). The City (Trans. by G. Neuwirth; Ed. by D. Martindale). Los Angeles: Free Press.
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).