Responsibility and Justice


  • Denys Kiryukhin Інститут філософії ім. Г.С.Сковороди НАН України


justice, responsibility, Rawls, Kant, responsibility for justice, collective responsibility


The research demonstrated the limitedness of Kant’s and Rawls’ approaches to the understanding of correlation of responsibility and justice. For Rawls, as well as for Kant, responsibility first of all relates to individual’s freedom (and with existence of just political institutions). In other words, the American philosopher concentrates on the problem of justice of institutes and individual actions. But the questions of human responsibility for environment, responsibility for realization of the principles of justice, at last, the problem of collective responsibility stay outside this approach. It is demonstrated that responsibility is determined not only and not so much by individual’s autonomy. Responsibility is connected with a feeling of guilt for the actions of community (to which the individual identifies himself), with a necessity of realization of the principles of justice through transformation of institutes and practices. At last, responsibility can be anthropologically determined in the case when we speak about the preservation of life on the earth. Interpretations of the sphere of responsibility and sphere of justice as coinciding ones were also refuted in the work. It was established, that the bounds of the former are wider at least because they include practices which are not regulated by the principles of justice.

Author Biography

Denys Kiryukhin, Інститут філософії ім. Г.С.Сковороди НАН України

кандидат філософських наук, науковий співробітник відділу соціальної філософії


Арістотель. Нікомахова етика / Αριστοτελους. Ηθικα Νικομαχεια. — К.: Аквілон-Плюс, 2002. — 480 с.

Баумейстер А. Філософія права. — Вінниця: О.Власюк, 2007. — 224 с.

Баумейстер А. Imputatio // Європейський словник філософій: Лексикон неперекладностей. Том перший. — К.: ДУХ І ЛІТЕРА, 2009. — С.485 — 497.

Кант И. Критика чистого разума // Кант И. Сочинения на немецком и русском языках. — М.: Наука, 2001 — 2006. — Т.2: Критика чистого разума: В 2 ч. Ч.1 / Под ред. Б. Бушлинга. Н. Мотрошиловой. — 2006. — 1081 c.

Кант И. Метафизика нравов // Кант И. Сочинения: В 8-ми т. — М.: Чоро, 1994. — Т.6. — C.224–544.

Нюрнбергский процесс. Сборник материалов: В 8-ми т. Т.1. — М.: Юридическая литература, 1987. — 688 c.

Тешке Б. Миф о 1648 годе: класс, геополитика и создание современных международных отношений. — М.: Издательский дом ГУ-ВШЭ, 2011. — 417 с.

Freeman S. Rawls. — London, New York: Routledge, 2010. — 550 p.

Miller D. National Responsibility and Global Justice. — New York: Oxford University Press, 2007. — 298 p.

Raffoul F. The Origins of Responsibility. — Bloomington: Indiana UP, 2010. — 341 p.

Rawls J. A Theory of Justice. — Cambridge: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, 2003. — 538 p.

Rawls J. Political Liberalism. — New York: Colombia University Press, 1996. — 464 p.

Responsibility and Distributive Justice / Ed. by C.Knight, Z.Stemplowska. — Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011. — 309 p.

Young I.M. Responsibility for Justice. — New York: Oxford University Press, 2011. — 193 p.

Young I.M. Responsibility and Global Justice: A Social Connection Model // Social Philosophy and Policy. — 2009. — Vol.19. — Issue 1. — P.102–130.


Abstract views: 269



How to Cite

Kiryukhin, D. (2017). Responsibility and Justice. Filosofska Dumka, (1), 64–77. Retrieved from



Download data is not yet available.