Methodological fundamentals of visual theory in the philosophical projects of Maurice Merleau-Ponty and Gilles Deleuze



the body, the sight, experience of the visual, the affectation, the haptic


This article aims to outline the methodological fundamentals of a presentational approach within a visual theory. Its supporters consider vision not as an act of objectivation but as a special form of contact between an object and a beholder. The article reconstructs philo- sophical foundations of this approach, basing on the vision theories developed by Maurice Merleau-Ponty and Gilles Deleuze. Therefore, the article outlines three primary principles of understanding vision: (1) visual experience cannot be reduced to the language or de- scribed through the language-derived structures; (2) the vision is an integrally corporeal experience that cannot be considered separately from the body itself; (3) the object takes an active part in the act of vision. Based on the works Merleau-Ponty and Deleuze, the ar- ticle offers terminological refinements that help avoid some methodological controversies of the visual theory. In particular, this refers to the reformulation of «visual experience» into «experience of the visual» — in this way we prevent the limitation of the vision to only its optical component.

Author Biography

Anastasiia Avetysian

postgraduate student at the Theoretical and Practical Philosophy department, Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv.


Avetysian, А. (2016). The Map of Visual Studies: the Main Lines of The Research. [In Ukrainian] Hileia: academic bulletin, 112, 241—244. [= Аветисян 2016]

Avetysian, А. (2017a). Husserl’s notion of affectation as a basis of the coneption of the «looking back» (part 2, pp. 132—134). In: Days of science of philosophy faculty — 2017 [report and presentations materials]. [In Ukrainian] Кyiv: Editorial polygraphical center «Kyiv univer-sity». [= Аветисян 2017]

Avetysian, А. (2017b). Cultural and philosophical accentuations of Thomas Mitchell’s visual theory. [In Ukrainian] Filosofia i politolohia v konteksti suchasnoi kultury. Scientific journal. Dnipro: Oles Honchar Dnipro national University, 2 (17), 4—11 [= Аветисян 2017]

Avetysian, А. (2018). Phenomenological Research of Visual Experience: the Look of a Painter (Based on the Works of Maurice Merleau-Ponty). [In Ukrainian] Philocophical thought, 1,

—105. [= Аветисян 2018]

Boehm, G., Mitchell, W.J.T. (2009). Pictorial versus Iconic Turn: Two Letters. Culture, Theory

and Critique, 50(2—3), 103—121.

Deleuze, G. (2002). Francis Bacon. Paris: Seuil.

Elkins, J. (1999). The object stares back. San Diego, CA: Harcourt.

Husserl, E. (2009). Experience and Judgment: Investigations in A Genealogy of Logic. [In Ukrainian]

Kyiv: PPC-2002. [= Гусерль 2009]

Merleau-Ponty, M. (2001). Phenomenology of Perception. [In Ukrainian] Kyiv: Ukrainian Center

of the Spiritual Culture. [= Мерло-Понті 2001]

Merleau-Ponty. M. (2003) The Visible and the Invisible. Followed by Working Notes. [In Uk-

rainian]. Kyiv: Publishing House KM «Academy». [= Мерло-Понті 2003] Merleau-Ponty, M. (1952) Le langage indirect et les voix du silence (pp. 41—82). In: Signes.

Paris: Gallimard.

Merleau-Ponty, M. (1964). L’oeil et l’esprit. Paris: Gallimard.. Retrieved from: http://classiques. Merleau-Ponty, M. (1966). Le doute de C zann. In: Sens et Non-sens (pp. 15-44). Paris: Les ditions Nagel. Retrieved from:


Merleau-Ponty, M. (1979). Le Visible et l’Invisible. Notes de travail. sous la direction de C. Lefort.

Paris: Gallimard. Retrieved from:


Mitchell, W. (1996). What Do Pictures «Really» Want? October, 77, 71.

Mitchell, W. (2005). There Are No Visual Media. Journal of Visual Culture, 4(2), 257—266. Moxey, K. (2008). Visual Studies and the Iconic Turn. Journal of Visual Culture, 7(2), 131—146. Sylvester, D. (1975). The Brutality of Fact: Interviews with Francis Bacon. New York: Pantheon Books.


Abstract views: 214



How to Cite

Avetysian, A. (2020). Methodological fundamentals of visual theory in the philosophical projects of Maurice Merleau-Ponty and Gilles Deleuze. Filosofska Dumka, (5), 81–92. Retrieved from



Download data is not yet available.