CONTINUITY OF PHILOSOPHICAL TRADITONS: Antiquity and Modernity (based on Plato’s “Cratylus” and Proclus’ “Commentary on Cratylus”)

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15407/fd2020.04.006

Keywords:

theological system, epistemology, intellect, neoplatonism, being, translation

Abstract

The phenomenon of language, being so familiar to us, still possesses unknown nature, origin, and, as we may say, function. For Plato, language was the way to cognition of the Universe. The phi- losophy of language, which was primarily initiated by Plato in his “Cratylus”, still has not ob- tained answers to the questions settled by great Greek thinker. In fact, it just acquired various solutions among different approaches during all four ages of understanding, namely Ancient, Scholastic, Modern and Post-modern periods. The article is supplemented with excerpts from the first Ukrainian translation of Proclus’ “Commentary on Plato’s “Cratylus”. The specifics of the style and vocabulary of the work is emphasized in the context of interpretation into Ukrainian. Historical and cultural context of Proclus’ works in general and particularly its “Commentaries” is addressed, and the main terminological system of his works is analyzed. Ukrainian equivalents are suggested. Some common features as well as discrepancies in Neoplatonist and Peripatetic approach are considered in the context of solutions to the same questions. Contrastive analysis of the “Commentary on Plato’s “Cratylus” with prior mythological context as well as with fol- lowing scholastic teaching is conducted in philosophical and linguistic aspects. The importance of problems placed by Plato in the field of epistemology and philosophy of language is addressed. Analogies with contemporary approach to linguistic and philosophical questions are considered in the scope of nativism and empiricism. Immutability of questions and mutability of generations and approaches is shown. The importance of previous works for the next development of con- temporary thought is emphasized.

Author Biography

Pavlo Sodomora

Doctor of Sciences in Philosophy, Candidate of Sciences in Philology, Head of the Department of Latin and Foreign Languages, Danylo Halytsky Lviv National Medical University, 69, Pekarska St., Lviv, 79010

References

Bos, E. (1992). On Proclus and his Influence in Medieval Philosophy. Leiden, New York. DOI: 10.1163/9789004320758

https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004320758

Chang Hah-Liang (2003). Is a language a primary modeling system? Sign System Studies, 31, 1-15.

Chlup, R. (2012). Proclus' polytheistic theology. Proclus: An Introduction, 112-136. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI: 10.1017/CBO9781139028042.005

https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139028042.005

Chomsky, N. (2002). On Nature and Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511613876

Deely, J. (2001). Four Ages of Understanding. S.l.: University of Toronto Press.

https://doi.org/10.3138/9781442675032

Dodds, E. (1992). Proclus: The Elements of Theology. S.l.: Clarendon press.

Helmig, Ch.; Steel, C. (2015). Proclus. In: The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Ed. by

E.N. Zalta). Retrieved from: https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2015/entries/proclus/ Lewy, H. (2011). Chaldean Oracles and Theurgy: Mysticism, Magic and Platonism in the Later Roman Empire. Paris: Etudes Augustiniennes.

Maran, T. (2010). Why was Thomas A. Sebeok not a cognitive ethologist? Biosemiotics, 3(3), 315-329. DOI: 10.1007/s12304-010-9079-8

https://doi.org/10.1007/s12304-010-9079-8

Mariev, S. (2017). Bysantine Perspective on Neoplatonism. Berlin, Boston: De Gruyter. McNally, Th. (2017). Wittgenstein and the Philosophy of Language: The Legacy of the Philoso-

phical Investigations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI: 10.1017/9781108181976 Peters, F. (1967). Greek Philosophical Terms: A Historical Lexicon. New York: NYU Press.

Plato (2017). Apology of Socrates. Dialogues (Tr. by Y. Kobiv, Yu. Mushak et al.). [In Ukrainian]. Kharkiv: Folio.

Plato (2018). Cratylus (427d-435е). [In Ukrainian]. Sententiae, 37(2), 108-140. DOI: 10.22240/sent37.02.108

https://doi.org/10.22240/sent37.02.108

Procli Diadochi (1908). Platonis Cratylum Commentaria (Ed. by G. Pasquali). Lipsiae. Retrieved from: https://archive.org/stream/proclidiadochii00pasqgoog#page/n19/mode/2up Proclus (1792). The Philosophical and Mathematical Commentaries (Tr. by T. Taylor). Retrieved from: https://play.google.com/books/reader?id=eJgfAQAAIAAJ&hl=en_GB&pg=GBS.

PP29

Proclus (2007). On Plato Cratylus (Tr. by B. Duvick). London: Bloomsbury.

Sebeok, Th.A.; Danesi, M. (2000). The Forms of Meaning: Modeling Systems Theory and Semiotic Analysis. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.

https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110816143

Sodomora, P. (2018). Language as a Way to Cognition (Plato's «Cratylus» in Ukrainian Translation). Sententiae, 37(2), 159-164. DOI: 10.22240/sent37.02.159

https://doi.org/10.22240/sent37.02.159

Sorabji, R.; Baltzly, D. (2006). Proclus: Commentary on Plato's Timaeus. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Taylor, Th. (2016). Introduction to the Philosophy and Writings of Plato. S.l.: Kypros Press. Thomas of Aquino (2010). The Sum of Theology (Tr. by P. Sodomora) [In Ukrainian]. Lviv:

Spolom,

Westerink, L.G. (2011). Anonymous Prolegomena to Platonic Philosophy. Edited with Translation. In: Platonic Texts and Translations (vol. V). S.l.: Westbury.

Yermolenko, V. (2011). Orpheus, Dionysus and dreams of regeneration [In Ukrainian]. Filosofska Dumka, 4, 126-129.

Downloads

Abstract views: 238

Published

2020-11-04

How to Cite

Sodomora, P. (2020). CONTINUITY OF PHILOSOPHICAL TRADITONS: Antiquity and Modernity (based on Plato’s “Cratylus” and Proclus’ “Commentary on Cratylus”). Filosofska Dumka, (4), 6–22. https://doi.org/10.15407/fd2020.04.006

Issue

Section

TOPIC OF THE ISSUE

Metrics

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.