Max Weber at the turn of the millennium: a new generation, new (epistemo) logics
Weber's legacy: at the crossroads of traditions
Keywords:Max Weber, epistemology, social, world image, disenchantment of the world
The article is devoted to the study of the Max Weber’s position in sociology and philosophy and the position of sociology and philosophy in relation to Max Weber at the turn of the millennium. The author addresses a number of aspects of Weber’s theory (epistemology, axiology, ontology at the microlevel and at the macrolevel), well known and studied in sociology, in order to produce a holistic picture of Max Weber’s conceptual and methodological proposals in terms of their epistemological perspective. In addition, the article examines the currently missed opportunities of Weber’s concept and theorizing, in particular, the paradox of sociological and philosophical discourses, the study of economic action, etc. The author using a wide range of analysts and concepts of Western (E. Troeltsch, J. Habermas, J. Kaube, W. Schluchter, S. Kalberg, T. Schwinn, H. Joas, J. Vahland, K. Palonen) and post-Soviet (Yu Davydov, L. Titarenko, S. Zolyan, T. Dmitriev) sociologists and philosophers, as well as analyzing a number of works of the German philosopher and sociologist himself, demonstrates the heuristic potential of Weber’s developments in various dimensions. The topics of the origins and roots of the Weberian concept, its methodology of science, the social status of science from Weber’s point of view, the place of enchantment in social and epistemological processes, the relationship between motive and meaning, the problem of administrative power and utility, human rights in Weber’s optics and macrohistorical logic in his research are touched upon. The author also draws attention to the connection between Weber’s socio-political and worldview position with his epistemological developments, his scientific and academic activities. Analogies are drawn between the situations of the early XX and early XXI centuries with the demonstration of the possibilities of Weber’s experience in the modern socio-cultural and historical situation.
Collins, R. (2002). Sociology of philosophies. Global theory of intellectual change. [In Russian]. Novosibirsk: Sibirskii khronograf.
Colliot-Theliene, C. (1998). Des usages de Max Weber. Pensee, 314, 5-14.
Davydov, Yu.N. (1998). Max Weber and modern theoretical sociology: actual problems of Weber's sociological doctrine. [In Russian]. Moscow: Martis.
Deviatko, I.F. (2003). Sociological theories of activity and practical rationality. [In Russian]. Moscow: Avanti-plus.
Gaidenko, P.P., Davydov, Yu.N. (1991). History and rationality. M. Weber's sociology and the Weberian Renaissance. [In Russian]. Moscow: Politizdat.
Golikov, O.S. (2018). Production of the order. Knowledge in the constitution of the social. [In Ukrainain]. Kharkiv: V.N. Karazin KhNU.
Gutorov, V.A. (1999). Max Weber and the socialist tradition. [In Russian]. Zhurnal sotsiologii i antropologii, II (3), 12-17.
Joas, H. (2011). Max Weber and the Origins of Human Rights: A Study of Cultural Innovation. [In Russian]. Zhurnal sotsiologii i sitsialnoi antropologii, 14 (1), 32-50.
Kalberg, S. (1994). Max Weber's Comparative-Historical Sociology. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Kaube, Yu. (2016). Max Weber at the turn of two eras. [In Russian]. Moscow: Dielo.
Lachmann, L.M. (1971). The legacy of Max Weber. Berkeley: Glendessary Press.
Lepsius, M.R. (2004). The originality and potential of the Weberian paradigm [In Russian]. Zhurnal sotsiologii i sitsialnoi antropologii, 7 (2), 51-60.
Lewis, D. (1981). Marxist Critique of Max Weber's Sociological Concepts. [In Russian]. Moscow
Lowy, M. (1998). Weber et Marx, protestantisme et capitalisme. Pensee, 314, 15-23.
Palonen, K. (2010). Objectivity as Fair Play. Weber's redefinition of the normative concept. Policy. [In Russian]. Politicheskie issledovania, 5, 129-145.
Patrushev, A.I. (1992). The unenchanted world of Max Weber. [In Russian]. Moscow: Publishing house of Moscow University.
Rakhmanov, A.B. (2012). Social philosophy of Max Weber. [In Russian]. Moscow: Krasand.
Schluchter, V. (2004). Action, order and culture: the main features of the Weberian research program. [In Russian]. Journal of Sociology and Social Anthropology, 2, 22-50.
Schwinn, Th. (2004). Von der historischen Entstehung zur aktuellen Ausbreitung der Moderne. Max Webers Soziologie im 21. Jahrhundert. Berliner Journal für Soziologie, 4, 527-544.
Symonds, M., Pudsey, J. (2008). The concept of «paradox» in the work of Max Weber. Sociology, 42 (2), 223-241.
Titarenko, L.G. (2020). Is Max Weber's legacy still relevant today? (to the 100th anniversary of his death). [In Russian]. Journal of the Belarusian State University. Sociology, 2, 54-60.
Toshchenko, Zh.T. (2011). Centaur problem (Experience of philosophical and sociological analysis). [In Russian]. Moscow: Novyi khronograf.
Trölch, E. (1994). Historicism and its problems. The logical problem of the philosophy of history. [In Russian]. Moscow: Yurist.
Vahland, J.V. (1999). Entzauberung. Max Weber und seine Interpreten. Kant-Studien. Meinz, 90 (4), 410-433.
Weber, M. (2005). Economy and society. [In Russian]. Economic Sociology, 6 (10), 46-68.
Weber, M. (1990). Selected works. [In Russian]. Moscow: Progress.
Zolian, S.T. (2018). On the problem of meaning in social semiotics: Max Weber today. [In Russian]. Slovo.ru: Baltiiskii aktsent, 9 (4), 7-42.
How to Cite
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).