OVERVIEW OF MODERN PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE

LOGIC, METHODOLOGY AND PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15407/fd2022.02.137

Keywords:

Global / general and local / science-centered philosophies of sciences, Features and classifications of philosophies of mathematical and natural sciences, A network of specific theories as the core of the relevant science, Practical theories and their reconstructions

Abstract

Varieties of modern philosophies of mathematical and natural sciences are represented. Specific features of those sciences are analyzed on the basis of graph classifications of the respective philosophies. The importance of reconstructions of practical theories is emphasized for all kinds of philosophies of science used by them.

The first part outlines the purpose of the article and considers subject and theoretical, the se- cond — evaluative, nominal, theoretical-reconstructive and linguistic-reconstructive classifica- tions of philosophies of science. The conclusions are made about the problematic application of these classifications to the philosophies of social sciences and humanities.

Author Biographies

Oleksandr GABOVICH

Doctor of Sciences in Physics and Mathematics, Principal Research Fellow, Department of Crystal Physics, Institute of Physics, NAS of Ukraine 46, Nauki Av., Kyiv, 03028

Volodymyr KUZNETSOV

Doctor of Sciences in Philosophy, Professor, Principal Research Fellow, Department of Logic and Methodology of Science / Chair of Physic-Mathematical Disciplines, H.S. Skovoroda Institute of Philosophy, NAS of Ukraine / National University of “Kyiv-Mohyla Academy” 4, Triokhsviatytelska St., Kyiv, 01601

References

Analytical Philosophy and Epistemology in Ukraine (1999). Theoria, 14 (34), 1-127. Anderson, P.W. (1972). More is different. Science, 177 (4047), 393-396.

https://doi.org/10.1126/science.177.4047.393

Balzer, W., Moulines, C.U., Sneed, J.D. (1987). The Architectonic for Science. The Structuralist Program. Dordrecht: Reidel.

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-3765-9

Balzer, W., Snead, J. (1989). New structuralism. [In Ukrainian]. Philosophical and Sociological Thought, 10, 81-95. [=Бальцер, Снід 1989]

Bauer, H.H. (1994). Scientific Literacy and the Myth of the Scientific Method (p. 29). Urbana, Chicago: University of Illinois Press.

Bernstein, R.J. (1978). The Restructuring of Social and Political Theory. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.

Bridgman, P.W. (1936). The Nature of Physical Theory. Princeton: Princeton University Press. Burch, T.K. (2018). Computer Modeling of Theory. Explanation for the Twenty-First Century. In: T.K. Burch, Model-Based Demography Essays on Integrating Data, Technique and Theory (p. 43-65). Cham: Springer.

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-65433-1_3

Burgin, M. (2011). The Theory of Named Sets. New York: Nova Science Publishers.

Burgin, M., Kuznetsov, V. (1986). The problem of a unified understanding of logical and mathematical reconstructions of scientific theories. [In Russuan]. In: M. Popovich (Ed.), Evidence and understanding (pp. 244-296). Kyiv: Scientific opinion. [=Бургин, Кузнецов, 1986] Burgin, M., Kuznetsov, V. (1993). Nomological structures of scientific theories. [In Russian]. Kyiv: Naukova dumka.

Burgin, M., Kuznetsov, V. (1994). Scientific problems and questions from a logical point of view.Synthese, 100 (1), 1-28.

https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01063918

Burgin, M., Kuznetsov, V. (1994a). Axiological aspects of scientific theories. [In Russian]. Kyiv: Naukova dumka.

Burgin, M., Kuznetsov, V. (1994b). An introduction to the modern exact methodology of science. Structures of knowledge systems. [In Russian]. Moscow: Aspect Press.

Close, F. (2022). Elusive. How Peter Higgs Solved the Mystery of Mass. New York: Basic Books. Ekland-Olson, S., Gibbs, S.P. (2018). Science and Sociology. Predictive Power is the Name of the Game. New York, London: Routledge.

Else, H. (2021). China's clampdown on fake-paper factories picks up speed. Nature, 598 (7879) 19-20.

https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-021-02587-3

French, S. (2021). There Are No Such Things as Theories. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Gabovich, A., Kuznetsov, V. (2019). Towards Periodizations of Science in the History of Science, In: Conference Book of Proceedings of 15th International Conference "History, Philosophy, and Science Teaching". Re-Introducing Science: Sculpting the Image of Science for Education and Media in Its Historical and Philosophical Background? July 15th - July 19th, 2019 (pp. 585-594). Thessaloniki, Greece.

Gabovich, O., Kuznetsov, V. (2013). What do we mean when using the acronym "BCS"? The Bardeen-Cooper-Schrieffer theory of superconductivity. European Journal of Physics, 34 (2), 371-382.

https://doi.org/10.1088/0143-0807/34/2/371

Gabovych, O., Kuznetsov, V. (2020). Theoretical physics. [In Ukrainian]. In: Great Ukrainian Encyclopedia. Retrieved from: https://vue.gov.ua/.

Gabovych, O., Kuznetsov, V. (2021a). External and internal semiotics of systems of scientific knowledge. [In Ukrainian]. In: T. Gardashuk (Ed.), Semiotic analysis of cultural phenomena (pp. 12-63). Kyiv: Institute of Philosophy, National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine.

Gabovych, O., Kuznetsov, V. (2021b). The decline of Western science as a symptom of the decline of the entire civilization. Sensor Electron. Microsystem. Technol. 18 (2): 33-46.

https://doi.org/10.18524/1815-7459.2021.2.235210

Gabovych, O., Kuznetsov, V., Semenova, N. (2016). Ukrainian fundamental science and European values (pp. 116, 117, 152, 156, 276). [In Ukrainian]. Kyiv: PH «Kyiv-Mohyla Academy».

Gangle, R. (2016). Diagrammatic Immanence. Category Theory and Philosophy Edinburgh: Edin- burgh University Press.

https://doi.org/10.1515/9781474404181

Halvorson, H. (2013). The semantic view, if plausible, is syntactic. Philosophy of Science, 80 (3), 475-478.

https://doi.org/10.1086/671077

Harre, R. (Ed.) (1993). Anglo-Ukrainian Studies in the Analysis of Scientific Discourse. Reason and Rhetoric. Lewiston, Queenston, Lampeter: The Edwin Mellen Press.

Imry, Y. (2002), Introduction to Mesoscopic Physics. [In Russian]. New York: Oxford University Press.

Irzik, G., G zeldere, G. (Eds) (2005). Turkish Studies in the History and Philosophy of Science, Dordrecht: Springer.

https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-3333-8

Korner, S. (1959). Conceptual Thinking. A Logical Inquiry. New York: Dover Publications. Krause, D., Videira, A. (2011). Brazilian Studies in Philosophy and History of Science. An Account of Recent Works. Dordrecht: Springer.

Krylov, A.I. (2021). The peril of politicizing science. Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters, 12 (22), 5371-5376.

https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpclett.1c01475

Kuś, M., Skowron, B. (Eds) (2019). Category Theory in Physics, Mathematics, and Philosophy. Cham: Springer.

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-30896-4

Kuznetsov, V. (2021). Modified structure-nominative reconstruction of practical physical theories as a frame for the philosophy of physics. Epistemological studies in philosophy, social and political sciences, 4 (1), 20-28. https://visnukpfs.dp.ua/in- dex.php/PFS/index.

https://doi.org/10.15421/342103

Lebedev, S.A. (2008). Philosophy of science. Brief encyclopedia (main trends, concepts, categories) (p. 458). [In Russian]. Moscow: Akademichnyi Proiekt.

Mormann, T. (1993). Natural predicates and topological structures of conceptual spaces. Syn- these, 95 (2), 219-240.

https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01064589

Parvu, I., Sandu, G., Toader, L. D. (Eds) (2015). Romanian Studies in Philosophy of Science. Cham: Springer.

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-16655-1

Pickett, S.T.A., Kolasa J., Jones C.G. (2007). Ecological Understanding, The Nature of Theory and the Theory of Nature. Amsterdam: Academic Press.

https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-012554522-8.50006-6

Polanyi, M. (2009). The Tacit Dimension. With a New Foreword by Amartya Sen. Chicago: Uni- versity of Chicago Press.

Sanitt, N. (1996). Science as a Questioning Process. Bristol: Institute of Physics Publishing. Savage, C.W. (1990). Preface. In: C.W. Savage (Ed.), Scientific Theories. Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science (vol. 14, pp. vii-ix). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

Scheiner, S.M, Willig, M.R. (2007). A General theory of ecology. In: S.M. Scheiner, M.R. Willig (Eds), The Theory of Ecology (pp. 3-18). Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Schneider, W.L. (2021). Social Theory. In: B. Hollstein, R. Greshoff, U., Schimank, A., Weiß (Eds), Soziologie - Sociology in the German-Speaking World (pp. 467-482). Oldenbourg: Gruyter.

Shverev, V. (2009). Theory. In: I.T. Kasavin (Ed.), Encyclopedia of epistemology and philosophy of science (p. 973). [Russuan]. Moscow: Kanon+.

Suppe, F. (1977). The search for philosophical understanding of scientific theories. In: F. Suppe, The Structure of Scientific Theories. Second edition (p. 3). Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press.

Suppe, F. (1998). The Semantic Conception of Theories and Scientific Realism. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.

Swedberg, R. (2017). The Art of Social Theory. Princeton, Oxford: Princeton University Press. Symposium on Logic and Philosophy of Science in the Ukraine (1994). Synthese, 100 (1), 1-48.

Vasiukov, V. (2009). Theory. [In Russian]. In: I.T. Kasavin (Ed.), Encyclopedia of philosophy and epistemology of science (p. 976). Moscow: Kanon+.

Vihalemm, R. (Ed.) (2001). Estonian Studies in the History and Philosophy of Science. Dordrecht: Springer.

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-0672-9

Willig, M.R., Scheiner, S.M. (2007). The state of theory in ecology. In: M. Scheiner, M.R. Willig (Eds), The Theory of Ecology (pp. 333-347). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Yolon, P. (2002). Theory. In: V. Shinkaruk (Ed.), Philosophical encyclopedic dictionary (p. 633). [In Ukrainian]. Kyiv: Abris.

Abstract views: 79

Published

2022-08-17

How to Cite

GABOVICH, O. ., & KUZNETSOV, V. . (2022). OVERVIEW OF MODERN PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE : LOGIC, METHODOLOGY AND PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE. Filosofska Dumka, (2), 137–154. https://doi.org/10.15407/fd2022.02.137

Metrics

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.