Democracy and Civic Space: Normative Models and Ukrainian Discourse

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15407/fd2023.04.071

Keywords:

Democracy, Civic space, Deliberative democracy, Civil society, Ukraine

Abstract

The article, authored by Ukrainian and Polish social researchers, analyses normative approaches towards understanding models of democracy and their relation to civic space. Despite the existence of multiple models of democracy, they can largely be reduced to two main forms: direct and representative democracy. Deliberative democracy is posited as a third form, which, according to some scientists, combines elements of representative, direct, and participatory democracy. The analysis is based on the assessment of democracy and civic space in Ukraine, utilising data from six applied international social studies, as well as the evaluation of the modern characteristics of some components of Ukrainian civic space. According to the rating of CIVICUS Monitor, Ukraine has been classified in the category of countries where the civic space is “obstructed” from 2019 to the present time (Autumn 2023). Currently, the advancement of civic space in Ukraine towards more favourable forms of freedom of association, peaceful assembly, and expression of opinion in the country are threatened by several factors simultaneously. The article also uses the results of the authors’ previous and current academic research, as well as the results of twenty years of advocacy and analytical work as public experts in Ukraine and Europe.

Author Biographies

Olena LAZORENKO

Ukraine, PhD, Senior  Research  Fellow, H.S. Skovoroda Institute of Philosophy, National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine 4, Triokhsviatytelska St., Kyiv, 01001.

Agnieszka KWIATKOWSKA

Poland, PhD, Assistant Professor, SWPS University & European University Institute, Warsaw (Poland).

References

Benhabib, S. (1996). Toward a Deliberative Model of Democratic Legitimacy // Democracy and Difference: contesting the boundaries of the political. Princeton University Press. P. 67-94

https://doi.org/10.1515/9780691234168-005

Bessette, J. M. (1980). Deliberative Democracy: The Majority Principle in Republican Government. How Democratic is the Constitution? Washington, D. C.: American Enterprise Institute for Public Policy Research. P. 102-116

CIVICUS Monitor. Tracking Civic Space. Ukraine. [Electronic resource]. Access mode:

https://monitor.civicus.org/country/ukraine/ (access date: 10.08.2023).

Cohen, J. (1989). Deliberation and Democratic Legitimacy // The Good Polity. Normative Analysis of the State / eds. A. Hamlin, B. Pettit. Oxford: Brasil Blackwell. P. 17-34.

Dryzek J. (2002). Deliberative Democracy and Beyond: Liberals, Critics, Contestations. New York: Oxford University Press.

https://doi.org/10.1093/019925043X.001.0001

Economist Intelligence Unit (2023). Democracy Index 2022. Frontline democracy and the battle for Ukraine [Electronic resource]. Access mode: https://pages.eiu.com/rs/753-RIQ-438/images/DI-final-version-report.pdf (access date: 3.09.2023).

Economist Intelligence Unit (2021). Democracy Index 2020. [Electronic resource]. Access mode:

https://www.eiu.com/n/campaigns/democracy-index-2020. (access date: 29.08.2023)

Economist Intelligence Unit (2022). Democracy Index 2022. [Electronic resource]. Access mode:

https://www.eiu.com/n/campaigns/democracy-index-2022 (access date: 29.08.2023)

Economist Intelligence Unit (2021). Democracy Index 2021. [Electronic resource]. Access mode:

https://www.eiu.com/n/campaigns/democracy-index-2021 (access date: 29.08.2023).

Gutmann, A., Thompson, D. (2004). Why Deliberative Democracy? Princeton University Press. 232 р.

https://doi.org/10.1515/9781400826339

Habermas, J. (1996). Between Facts and Norms. Contributions to Discourse Theory of Law and Democracy. Cambridge, Massachusetts: The MIT Press.

https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/1564.001.0001

Habermas, J. (2000). Structural Transformations in the Field of Openness: Study of the Civil Society Category. Lviv. [In Ukrainian].

Habermas, J. (2006). Involvement of the Other: Studies in Political Theory. Lviv: Astrolabia. 416 p. [In Ukrainian].

Held, D. (2006). Models of Democracy. Stanford University Press. 338 p.

Independent Reporting Mechanism Action Plan Overview: Ukraine 2021-2022 Open Government Partnership Initiative. [Electronic resource]. Access mode:

https://www.opengovpartnership.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/11/Ukraine_Action-Plan-Review_2021-2022_UKR.pdf (access date: 10.08.2023). [In Ukrainian].

Keane, J. (2009). Mass Media and Democracy / J. Keane [trans. from English O. Hrytsenko]. K.: K.I.S. 134 p. [In Ukrainian].

Kyiv International Institute of Sociology. Report on Civil Society in Wartime in Ukraine. Kyiv. December 2022-January 2023. P.12. [In Ukrainian].

Kwiatkowska, A., Muliavka, V. & Plisiecki, H. (2023). Hollowed or redefined? Changing visions of democracy in the political discourse of Law and Justice. Democratization, 30(3), 458-478.

https://doi.org/10.1080/13510347.2022.2152439

Lazorenko O. (2020). Civil Society as Driver in Democratic Discourse of Adult Learning, Filosofska Dumka, (5), 41-59р.

https://doi.org/10.15407/fd2020.05.041

Lichtenberg L. (1994). Foundations and Limits of Freedom of the Press / Democracy and the Mass Media: A Collection of Essays / Edited by: Judith Lichtenberg. Cambridge: CUP. 424 p.

Linz, J. (1978). The Breakdown of Democratic Regimes: Crisis, Breakdown and Re-equilibration. Baltimore and London: Johns Hopkins University Press. 144 p.

https://doi.org/10.56021/9780801820229

Linz, J. (1996). Toward Consolidated Democracies / J. Linz, J., Stepan, A. // Journal of Democracy. Vol. 7, no. 2. P. 17.

https://doi.org/10.1353/jod.1996.0031

Minakov, M., Rojansky, M. (2018). Democracy in Ukraine: Are We There Yet? Kennan Cable, 30. P. 1-17, 116 [Electronic resource]. Access:

https://www.wilsoncenter.org/sites/default/files/media/documents/publication/kennan_cable_30_-_rojansky_minakov.pdf (access date: 9.09.2023).

Miro-Llinares, F., Aguerri, J. C. (2021). Misinformation about Fake News: A Systematic Critical Review of Empirical Studies on the Phenomenon and Its Status as a «Threat». European Journal of Criminology.

OECD (2022). The Protection and Promotion of Civic Space. [Electronic resource].

https://doi.org/10.1787/d234e975-en

https://www.oecd.org/gov/the-protection-and-promotion-of-civic-space-d234e975-en.htm (access date: 10.08.2023).

Schmitter, P. (1994). The Conceptual Travels of Transitologists and Consolidologists: How Far

https://doi.org/10.2307/2500331

East Should They Attempt to Go? / P. Schmitter, T. Karl // Slavic Review. Vol. 53, no. 1 (Spring).

Sen, A. K. (1999). Democracy as a Universal Value. Journal of Democracy, 10 (3), 3-17.

https://doi.org/10.1353/jod.1999.0055

Sen, Amartya K. (2001). Development as Freedom. London: Oxford University Press.

Sunstein, Cass R. (2018). Is Social Media Good or Bad for Democracy? Internet and Democracy.

[Electronic resource]. Access mode: https://sur.conectas.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/07/sur-27-ingles-cass-sunstein.pdf

Wojciechowska, M. (2010). Deliberative Democracy as an Answer for Crisis in Democratic Governance [Electronic resource] // Radical Politics Today, April 2010. Access mode:

https://research.ncl.ac.uk/spaceofdemocracy/word%20docs%20linked%20to/Uploaded%202009and10/Marta/Deliberative_Democracy_as_an_Answer_for_Crisis_in_Democratic__Governance.pdf (access date:5.04.2023).

Yermolenko, A. (2019). Academic Philosophy in Changing Paradigms. Philosophical Dialogues 2019. Collection Dedicated to the 100th Anniversary of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine "Philosophy in the Academy: Achievements, Problems, Prospects", Issue 17-18. Kyiv. P.15. [In Ukrainian].

Abstract views: 116

Published

2023-12-21

How to Cite

LAZORENKO, O., & KWIATKOWSKA, A. (2023). Democracy and Civic Space: Normative Models and Ukrainian Discourse. Filosofska Dumka, (4), 71–102. https://doi.org/10.15407/fd2023.04.071

Issue

Section

TOPIC OF THE ISSUE

Metrics

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.