Descartes’ mind-body dualism in the contemporary retrospective


  • Dmytro Sepetyi Zaporizhzhya State Medical University


mental, physical, mind, substance, thinking, extension, subject, reason


The article discusses the significance of the main ideas of Descartes’ philosophy of mind from the point of view of their reception, criticism and transformation in the contemporary analytical Philosophy of Mind. There is criticized the typical mistaken interpretation of Descartes’ substance dualism as the doctrine that the mind is made of a non-physical thinking stuff; there is also explained that Descartes’ thinking substance is an absolutely indivisible entity (mental subject, self) and so does not consist of any stuff. The author considers Descartes’ main arguments for substance dualism and ascertains their tenability and close connection with the most important contemporary arguments against materialism. On these grounds, one can conclude that the main ideas of Descartes’ philosophy of mind, provided moderate adaptation-modernization, remain actual and form a consistent and feasible system that assigns an appropriate place for the human person as a subject of experiences, thinking, awareness, will, and conscious, purposeful activity.

Author Biography

Dmytro Sepetyi, Zaporizhzhya State Medical University

candidate of sciences in philosophy, associate professor at the Department of Social Dis ciplines


Blackmore, S. (1993). Dying to Live. Buffalo, New York: Prometheus Books. [= Blackmore 1993]

Bogachov, A., Vahtel, A., Verloka, V. and others. (2015). Translation as (mis)understanding. Terminological discussion. [In Ukrainian]. Philosophical Thought, 5, 68–93. [= Богачов 2015]

Bodnarchuk, L., Sen', A. (2014). Cottingam's Conception of Descartes' Trialism and Modern Discussions. [In Ukrainian]. Sententiae, ХХХ(1), 196–209. [= Боднарчук 2014]

Chalmers, D. (1996). The Conscious Mind. New York, Oxford: Oxford University Press. [= Chalmers 1996]

Chalmers, D. (2013). The Conscious Mind. [In Russian]. Moscow: Librocom. [= Чалмерс 2013]

Chalmers, D. (2015). Argument 1: The logical possibility of zombies. [In Ukrainian]. Philosophical Thought, 5, 60–67. [= Чалмерс 2015]

Descartes, R. (2000). Metaphysical Meditations. [In Ukrainian]. K.: Universe. [= Декарт 2000]

Descartes, R. (2014). Meditations on First Philosophy / Metaphysical Meditations. [In Uk rainian, Latin, and French]. In O. Khoma (Ed.), Descartes’ «Meditations» in the Mirror ofModern Interpretations (pp. 115–292). K.: Duh i Litera. [= Декарт 2014]

Dennett, D. (2004). Kinds of Minds: Toward an Understanding of Consciousness. [In Russian]. Moscow: Idea-Press. [= Деннет 2004]

Feigl, H. (1958) The «Mental» and the «Physical». In H. Feigl, M. Scriven, anf G. Maxwell (Eds.), Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science. Vol. 2 (pp. 370–497). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press. [= Feigl 1958]

Kripke, S. (1980). Naming and Necessity. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press. [= Kripke 1980]

Leibniz, G. W. (1982). Monadology. [In Russian]. In G. W. Leibniz, Works in 4 vol. Vol. 1 (pp. 413–429). Moscow: Thought. [= Лейбниц 1982]

Levine, J. (2001). Purple Haze: The Puzzle of Consciousness. New York, Oxford: Oxford University Press. [= Levine 2001]

McGinn, C. (1999). The Mysterious Flame. New York: Basic Books. [= McGinn 1999]

Midgley, M. (2002). Science and Poetry. London, New York: Routledge. [= Midgley 2002]

Nagel, T. (1979). Panpsychism. In T. Nagel, Mortal Questions (pp. 181–196). New York: Cambridge

University Press. [= Nagel 1979]

Popper, K. (1953). Language and the Body-Mind Problem. Proceedings of the 11th International Congress of Philosophy, Vol. 7, 101–107. [= Popper 1953]

Popper, K. (1966). Of Clouds and Clocks. St. Louis, Missouri: Washington University. [= Popper 1966]

Searle, J. (1980). Minds, Brains and Programs. The Behavioral and Brain Sciences, Vol. 3, 417–424. [= Searle 1980]

Searle, J. (1992). The Rediscovery of the Mind. Cambridge, London: The MIT Press. [= Searle 1992]

Searle, J. (2002). The Rediscovery of the Mind. [In Russian]. Moscow: Idea-Press. [= Серл 2002]

Synytsya, A. S. (Ed.), (2014). Anthology of Contemporary Analytic Philosophy, or Beetle Leaves a Box. [In Ukrainian]. L’viv: Litopys. [= Синиця 2014]


Abstract views: 483



How to Cite

Sepetyi, D. (2017). Descartes’ mind-body dualism in the contemporary retrospective. Filosofska Dumka, (3), 64–73. Retrieved from



Download data is not yet available.

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 > >>