Quantum Mechanics and Consciousness: No Evidence for Idealism




quantum mechanics, consciousness, matter, collapse, idealism, physical realism, cosmopsychism


The article deals with the issue of whether quantum mechanics provides evidence for the view that ordinary matter is the product of the processes that essentially involve conscious- ness (in collapses, or reductions, of quantum-mechanical waves). It is pointed out that if this were the case, this would have tremendous consequences that anyone who takes science seri- ously can hardly welcome — it would make nonsense of the whole natural pre-animal his- tory, and would also make it extremely difficult to make sense of animal evolution and hu- man history. It is argued, however, that there is no good scientific evidence for the idealistic (consciousness-involving) construal of quantum-mechanical processes; moreover, unequiv- ocal experimental refutations were produced but not made widely known. In the second part, the recent attempt to draw quantum mechanics in support of idealism by Bernardo Kastrup is discussed and found wanting, because in so far as his defense of idealism is suc- cessful, the resulting kind of idealism (cosmopsychism) stands to the results of quantum mechanical experiments in the same relations as common physical realism.

Author Biography

Dmytro Sepetyi

PhD in philosophical sciences, associate professor at the department of social disciplines of Zaporizhzhia state medical university. Scientific interests: philosophy of mind, episte- mology, political philosophy.


Durr,S.,Nonn, T.,Rempe,G.(1998). Origin of quantum-mechanical complementarity probed by a ‘which-way’ experiment in an atom interferometer. Nature, 395, 33-37.

Eichmann, U. et al. (1993). Young’s interference experiment with light scattered from two atoms. Physical Review Letters, 70, 2359-2362.

Feynman, R. (1965). The Character of Physical Law. London: The British Broadcasting Corporation. Feynman, R., Leighton, R., Sands, M. (1965). The Feynman Lectures on Physics (vol. 3). US: Addison-Wesley, 1965.

Goode, E. (2013). Paranormalism and Pseudoscience as Deviance. In Pigliucci, M., Boudry, M. 104(eds). Philosophy of pseudoscience: reconsidering the demarcation problem (pp. 145-163). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Kastrup, B. (2017a). On the Plausibility of Idealism: Refuting Criticisms. Disputatio,9 (44), 13-34.

Kartrup, B. (2017b). Making Sense of the Mental Universe. Philosophy and Cosmology, 19, 33-49.

London, F., Bauer, E. (1939) La theorie de l’observation en mecanique quantique. Paris: Hermann & Cie. Mandel, L. (1999). Quantum effects in one-photon and two-photon interference. Review of Modern Physics,71, 274-282.

Radin, D. (2006). Entangled Minds: Extrasensory Experiences in a Quantum Reality. Paraview

Pocket Books.

Stapp, H. (1993). Mind, Matter, and Quantum Mechanics. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.

Stapp, H. (2007). Mindful Universe: Quantum Mechanics and the Participating Observer. Berlin:


Stapp, H. (2017). Quantum Theory and Free Will: How Mental Intentions Translate into Bodily

Actions. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.

Weinberg, S. (1993). The First Three Minutes. Basic Books.

Wigner, E. (1961). Remarks on the Mind-Body Question, In Good, I. J. (ed.) The Scientist

Speculates (pp. 284-302). London: William Heinemann, Ltd.

Wigner, E. (1964). Two Kinds of Reality. The Monist, 48 (2), 248-264.

Yu, Sh., Nicoli , D. (2011). Quantum mechanics needs no consciousness. Annalen der Physik,

(11), 931-938.

Zeilinger, A. (1999). Experiment and the foundations of quantum physics. Review of Modern

Physics,71, 288-297.

Zou, X. Y., Wang, L. J., Mandel, L. (1991). Induced coherence and indistinguishability in optical interference. Physical Review Letters, 67, 318-321.


Abstract views: 124



How to Cite

Sepetyi, D. (2020). Quantum Mechanics and Consciousness: No Evidence for Idealism: PHILOSOPHY OF MIND. Filosofska Dumka, (4), 95–105. Retrieved from https://dumka.philosophy.ua/index.php/fd/article/view/430


Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 > >>