A word to Heidegger? The limits of tolerance in the oral history of philosophy

Keywords: interview, ethics, propaganda, Martin Heidegger, Nazism, Barbara Cassin, Alain Badieu

Abstract

The beginning of the new realm in philosophical research, which is the oral history of phiosophy, is followed by the consequential set of serious ethical issues. The purpose of this article is to identify moral orientations a historian of philosophy can rely on in oral communication with respondents. The starting point of the analysis is the ethical standards of interviews developed by the Oral History Society. An example to test these standards based on the principle of maximum tolerance is the case of Martin Heidegger. Considering the ambiguity of some outstanding philosophical figures, the main task of the article is to find the line between propagation of the dangerous views of the philosopher and objective philosophical analysis. As a guide to the ethics of interviewing philosophers, I propose the approach suggested by Alain Badieu and Barbara Cassin regarding Heidegger. They claim that a great philosopher can simultaneously be a Nazi and an anti-Semite. I outlined the general feature of interaction with ambiguous personalities in a philosophical interview: (1) the interviewer should not make extreme judgments in advance; (2) We have no right to remove some ambiguous philosophers from discourse, and communication with them is a personal matter of the interviewer. But philosophical community should produce the criteria for exact distinction between the sphere of ethically unacceptable and realm of uncertain.

Author Biography

Sofiia Dmytrenko

undergraduate student, Faculty of Philosophy, Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv (Ukraine).

References

Aeschimann, E., Cassin, B. (2014, September 20). Barbara Cassin: “Nous savions tous que Heidegger avait été nazi”. Retrieved June 20, 2019 from bibliobs.nouvelobs website: https://bibliobs.nouvelobs.com/essais/20140919.OBS9704/barbara-cassin-nous-savions-tous-que-heidegger-avait-ete-nazi.html?fbclid=IwAR3DHDGYGyY61Kl2EMfVCfyGXanpIJPTrH2nF1Hk37%20SCX7IMKrNqrm%205XgYg

Badiou, A. (2014, 21 December). A letter. Retrieved from: https://www.versobooks.com/blogs/1796-a-letter-from-alain-badiou

Badiou, A., Cassin, B. (2016). Heidegger: His Life and His Philosophy. New York: Columbia University Press. https://doi.org/10.7312/badi15796

Boss, M. (2001). Preface to the American translation of Martin Heidegger’s Zollikon Seminars. In M. Heidegger, Zollikon Seminars: Protocols, Conversations, Letters. Evanston: Northwestern University Press.

Cassin, B., Ivry, B. (2018, 13 September). Barbara Cassin: What Hannah Arendt Could Teach Israel. Retrieved from: https://forward.com/culture/410055/barbara-cassin-what-hannah-arendt-could-teach-israel/

Heidegger, M. (1981). Only a God Can Save Us. In T. Sheehan, Heidegger: The Man and the Thinker (pp. 45-67). Chicago: Precedent.

Jessee, E. (2011). The Limits of Oral History: Ethics and Methodology Amid Highly Politicized Research Settings. The Oral History Review. 38(2), 287-307. https://doi.org/10.1093/ohr/ohr098

Sharpless, R. (2006). The History of Oral History. In T. L. Charlton, L. E. Myers, & R. Sharpless (Eds.), Handbook of Oral History. Rowman: Altamira Press.

Sheftel, A., Zembrzycki, S.. (2016). Who’s Afraid of Oral History? Fifty Years of Debates and Anxiety about Ethics. Oral History Review, 43(2), 338-366. https://doi.org/10.1093/ohr/ohw071

Wheeler, M. (2018, Winter). Martin Heidegger. Retriewed from The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy website: https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2018/entries/heidegger/

Wolin, R. (2014, Summer). National Socialism, World Jewry, and the History of Being: Heidegger’s Black Notebooks. Retriewed from Jewish Review of Books website: https://jewishreviewofbooks.com/articles/993/national-socialism-world-jewry-and-the-history-of-being-heideggers-black-notebooks/

Published
2020-01-04
How to Cite
Dmytrenko, S. (2020). A word to Heidegger? The limits of tolerance in the oral history of philosophy. Filosofska Dumka, (4), 81-92. https://doi.org/10.15407/fd2019.04.081
Section
TOPIC OF THE ISSUE