Oleksandr Komarov. “Language is the house of being”. What does Heidegger's saying mean?

Keywords: language, being, knowledge, name, form, idea of good, speech, thinking, statement, exis- tential structure, truth, idea

Abstract

The purpose of the article is to demonstrate how Heidegger's statement, "Language is the House of Being," claims to represent the essence of all Western European philosophy, namely, as an outline of the unity of indirect identities - being, form and name. The author raises a number of questions in his research. Can we identify "beginning" and "consequence" by exploring the phenomenon of language? Is there anything in the language between beginning and effect? What is a language? And why does Heidegger call language home? Is it possible to identify philosophically what makes language possible regardless of cultural contexts and historical eras? Does the question "What is language?" at the same time lead us to the question "What is a person?" and then "What does it mean to be?"

The article focuses on the connection of Heidegger's philosophy with Plato's philosophy, and therefore on the constancy of fundamental philosophical problems, which finds different ways of expression (mythological, metaphysical, phenomenological...).

The second part of the article is devoted to the actual analysis of the concept of "house of being" through the comprehension of the speech (communicative) dimension of one's being. The author also explores the concept of Heidegger's philosophy of openness, distance, speech: existence is Dasein's relation to being, that is, to one's own making; speech (Rede) as a mode of openness (Dasein) is an existential phenomenon; language (Sprache) is an implementation of self-projecting (entwerfen) speech (Rede) into the "world". Given that a language contains a plurality of certain elements and relationships, the essential unity of the language should be sought at the discontinuity. The gap means openness and freedom of speech. That is, the existential condition of the possibility of language, called in the early Heidegger openness, in his later work appears as a gap, but here and there it is the essential language, which is at the same time the essence of man.

Author Biography

Oleksandr Komarov

second year student master’s degree at Philosophy Department, Taras Shevchenko Kyiv National University, 60, Volodymyrska St., Kyiv, 01033

References

Plato (s.a.(a)). Cratylus. Retrideved from: https://books.google.com.ua/books?id=ceOQKf0Zv FMC&printsec=frontcover&dq=Plato.+Cratylus&hl=ru&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwi41q7j wsXnAhUBxYsKHWzBArYQ6AEIKTAA#v=onepage&q=Plato.%20Cratylus&f=false

Plato (s.a.(b)). The Republic. Retrieved from: https://books.google.com.ua/books?id=aPwPj VIxbGQC&printsec=frontcover&dq=Plato.+the+Republic&hl=ru&sa=X&ved=0ahU KEwihtKmMwsXnAhUMtosKHf-DBAoQ6AEIKTAA#v=onepage&q=Plato.%20 the%20Republic&f=false

Hegel, G.F.W. (1990). Wissenschaft der Logik: Die Lehre vom Sein. Hamburg: Felix Meiner Verlag.

Hegel, G.F.W. (2006). Ph nomenologie des Geistes. Hamburg: Felix Meiner Verlag.

Heidegger, M. (1954). Platons Lehre von der Wahrheit. Bern: Franke AG.

Heidegger M. (1963). Sein und Zeit. T bingen: Max Neimeyer Verlag.

Heidegger, M. (1967). Der europ ische Nihilismus. Stuttgart: Union Druckerei GmbH.

Heidegger, M. (1973). Vom Wesen des Grundes. Frankfurt a.M.: Vittorio Klostermann.

Heidegger, M. (1985). Der Wille zur Macht als Kunst. Frankfurt a.M.: Vittorio Klostermann.

Heidegger, M. (1985). Unterwegs zur Sprache. Frankfurt a.M.: Vittorio Klostermann.

Heidegger, M. (2000 [1954]). Briefuber den Humanismus. Frankfurt a.M.: Vittorio Kloster-mann.

Husserl, E. (1913). Ideen zu einer reinen Ph nomenologie und ph nomenologischen Philosophie. Halle: Verlag von Max Niemeyer.

Jaspers, K. (1971). Psychologie der Weltanschauungen. K ln: Springer-Verlag. Kant, I. (1998). Kritik der reinen Vernunft. Hamburg: Felix Meiner Verlag.

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-52170-6

Published
2020-06-18
How to Cite
Komarov, O. (2020). Oleksandr Komarov. “Language is the house of being”. What does Heidegger’s saying mean?. Filosofska Dumka, (1), 52-69. https://doi.org/10.15407/fd2020.01.052

Most read articles by the same author(s)