The concept of rationality in the sociology of Max Weber and its impact on modern social sciences
Weber's legacy: at the crossroads of traditions
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15407/fd2021.01.037Keywords:
purposive rationality, rationality, value, ethos, formal rationality, material rationality, communicative rationality, systemic rationalityAbstract
The paper analyzes Max Weber’s concepts of rationality and rationalization as components of modernization processes in modern society. The author reconstructs Weber’s interpretation of “spiritual factors” of social development, which emerge in the ethos of Protestantism. The research demonstrates how Weber’s study of capitalism in terms of rationality corresponds with concepts of other classics of German sociology, such as Ferdinand Tönnies, Werner Sombart, Georg Simmel and others. The article emphasizes the relevance of Weber’s sociology for XX— XXI centuries and how its basic concepts and methodological approaches have been further de- veloped by scholars, including Ukrainian ones.
Weber’s concept of rationality is applicable not only to the mental-epistemological sphere, it also acquires a social meaning. This approach has gained recognition in phenomenological sociology, theory of social systems, communicative theory and more. In addition to the formal rationality of the economy, modern social sciences use such concepts as social, aesthetic, ethical, environmental, and practical rationality. Weber’s “diagnosis of the age” is still a component of the “diagnosis” of modern society. The gap between values and interests remains an integral feature of the “risks and threats society” in the XXI century. This situation is especially evident in international relations, when “real politics” (Realpolitik), based on interests, becomes insensitive to “value postulates”. The author also discovers ways of value (moral and ethical) reclama- tion of modern society, particularly in the concepts of “ethical economy”, universalist ethics of discourse, global ethos and more.
References
Apel, K.-O. (1988). Diskurs und Verantwortung. Das Problem des Übergangs zur postkonventionel- len Moral. Frankfurt a. M.: Suhrkamp.
Apel, K.-O. (2017). Transzendentale Reflexion und Geschichte. Frankfurt a. M.: Suhrkamp. Apel, K.O., Hösle, V., Simon-Schaffer, R. (1998). Die Tatsache der «Globalisierung» und die Aufgabe der Philosophie (Podiumsdiskussion). Im: K.-O. Apel, V. Hösle, Simon-Schaffer, R., Globalisierung. Herausforderung für die Philosophie. Bamberg: Universitäts-Verlag. Böhler, D. (2008). Mitverantwortung für die Menschheitszukunft. Die Aktualität vom Hans Jo- nas. Im: M. Sapper, V. Weichsel (Hg.), Grünbuch. Politische Ökologie im Osten Europas. Berlin: Berliner Wissenschafts-Verlag.
Boḧ ler, D. (2014). Responsibility for the future from a global perspective. The relevance of Hans Jonas’s philosophy and ethics of discourse. Transl. from German, afterword, notes by A. Yermolenko. [In Ukrainian]. Kyiv: Stilus. [=Бьолер 2014]
Deviatkova, R. (1968). M. Weber and the problem of the “western rationality”. [In Russian]. The Bulletin of Leningrad university. Series “Philosophy, Economy. Law”, 3, No17, 117–129. [=Девяткова, 1968]
Fischer, K.H. (1908). Protestantische Ethik und «Geist des Kapitalismus»: Replik auf Herrn Prof. Max Webers Gegenkritik. Im: Archiv für Sozialwissenschaften und Sozialpolitik. B. XXVI, H.1. (SS. 270–274).
Habermas, J. (1981). Theorie des kommunikativen Handelns. B.1. Handlungsrationalität und Gesellschaftliche Rationalisierung. Frankfurt a. M.: Suhrkamp.
Habermas, J. (1981a). Theorie des kommunikativen Handelns. B.2. Zur Kritik der funktionalistischen Vernunft. Frankfurt a. M.: Suhrkamp.
Haidenko, P. (1979). Sociology of Max Weber. In: History of bourgeois sociology in 19th — early 20th centuries (pp. 253–308). [In Russian]. Moscow: Science. [=Гайденко 1998] Haidenko, P., Davydov, Yu.N. (1991). History and rationality. Sociology of Max Weber and Weberian renaissance. [In Russian]. Moscow: Politizdat. [=Гайденко, Давидов, 1991]
Horkheimer, M. (2006). The Critique of Instrumental Reason. Transl. from German by M. Kultaeva. [In Ukrainian]. Kyiv: PPS–2002. [=Горкгаймер, 2006]
Horkheimer, M., Adorno, Th. (1969). Dialektik der Aufkl rung. Philosophische Fragmente. Frankfurt a. M.: Fischer.
Hösle, V. (1990). Die Krise der Gegenwart und die Verantwortung der Philosophie. Transzendentalpragmatik, Letztbegründung, Ethik. München: Beck.
Jonas, H. (1987). Prinzip Verantwortung: Versuch einer Ethik f r die technologische Zivilisation. Zürich: Buchclub Ex Libris.
Jonas, H. (2001). The imperative of responsibility: in search of an ethics for the technological age. Transl. from German, afterword, notes by A. Yermolenko. [In Ukrainian]. Kyiv: Libra. [=Йонас, 2001] Koslowski, P. (1982). Ethik des Kapitalismus. Mit einen Kommentar von James Buchanan. Tübimgen: Mohr.
Koslowski, P. (1988). Prinzipien der Ethischen Ökonomie. Grundlegung der Wirtschaftsethik und der auf die Ökonomie bezogenen Ethik. Tübingen: Mohr.
Kremen, V. (2012). Max Weber — the creator of “the spirit of capitalism”. In: M. Weber, Economy and Society. Essays on the sociology of understanding (pp. 11-20). [In Ukrainian]. Kyiv: Vse- svit. [=Кремень, 2012]
Kuhlmann, W. (1985). Reflexive Letztbegründung. Freiburg, München.
Küng, H (1997). Weltethos für Weltpolitik und Weltwirtschaft. München, Zürich: Piper.
Küng, H (2010). Anständig wirtschaften. Warum Ökonomie Moral braucht. München: Piper. Luhmann, N. (1967). Soziologie als Theorie sozialer Systeme. Kölner Zeitschrift für Soziologie und Sozialpsychologie, 1967, 4, 615–644.
Luhmann, N. (2011). The concept of purpose and system rationality: on the function of purposes in social systems. Transl. from German by M. Boichenko, V. Kebuladze. [In Ukrainian]. Kyiv: Dukh i Litera. [=Луман, 2011]
Marcuse, H. (1964). Industrialisierung und Kapitalismus. Im: Max Weber und Soziologie heute (SS.161–180). Tübingen: Mohr.
Marcuse, H. (1967). Der eindimensionale Mensch. Frankfurt a. M.: Suhrkamp.
Neusykhyn, A. (1994). Max Weber’s “Empirical sociology” and the logic of historical science. [In Russian]. In: M. Weber, Selected works. The image of society. Transl. from German (pp. 589–656). Moscow: Lawer. [=Неусыхин, 1994]
Neusykhyn, A. (1994a). Max Weber’s sociological study of the city. [In Russian]. In: M. Weber, Selected works. The image of society. Transl. from German (pp. 658–691). Moscow: Lawer. [=Неусыхин, 1994a]
Prychepii, E. (1983). Bourgeois sociology of knowledge (critics of methodological principles). [In Russian]. Kyiv: Naukova dumka. [=Причепий, 1983]
Simmel, G. (1922). Philosophie des Geldes. 4. unveränderte Auflage. Leipzig: Funcker und Humblot.
Sombart, W. (1904). Modern capitalism. Vol. 1. Genesis of capitalism. [In Russian]. Moscow: Gorshkov. [=Зомбарт, 1904]
Sombart, W. (1911). Die Juden und das Wirtschaftsleben. Leipzig: Duncker & Humblot.
Tönnis, F. (1926). Fortschritt und soziale Entwicklung. Geschichtsphilosophische Ansichten. Karlsruhe: Braun.
Ulrich, P. (1986). Transformation der ökonomischen Vernunft: Fortschrittsperspektiven der modernen Industriegesellschaft. Stuttgart, Bern: Haupt.
Ulrich, P. (1987). Die Weiterentwicklung der ökonomischen Rationalität — Zur Grundlegung der Ethik der Unternehmung. Im: B. Von Biervert, M. Hel. (Hrsg.), Ökonomische Theorie
und Ethik (SS. 122–149). Frankfurt a. M., N.Y.: Campus.
Weber, M (1922a). Gesammelte Aufsätze zur Religionssoziologie. Tübingen.: Mohr.
Weber, M. (1919). Erster Vortrag Prof. Max Weber (München). Wissenschaft als Beruf. Im: Geistige Arbeit als Beruf. Vier Vorträge vor dem Freistudentischen Bund (SS. 1–37). München und Leipzig: Verlag von Duncker & Humblot.
Weber, M. (1919a). Zweiter Vortrag: Max Weber. Politik als Beruf. Im: Geistige Arbeit als Beruf. Vier Vorträge vor dem Freistudentischen Bund (SS. 2–67). München und Leipzig: Verlag von Duncker & Humblot.
Weber, M. (1921). The City. [In Russian]. Мoscow: STRELKA PRESS. Weber, M. (1923). The history of economy. [In Russian]. Petrograd: Science and School. [=Вебер 1923]
Weber, M. (1922). Wirtschaft und Gesellschaft. Tübingen: Mohr.
Weber, M. (1968). Roscher und Knies und die logische Probleme der historischen Nationalökonomie. Gesammelte Aufsätze zur Wissenschaftslehre. Tübingen: Mohr.
Weber, M. (1994). The Protestant Ethic and the Spirit of Capitalism. Transl. from German by O. Pohorilyi. [In Ukrainian]. Kyiv: Osnovy. [=Вебер 1994]
Weber, M. (1998). Sociology. General historical analyzes. Policy. Transl. from German, afterword, notes by O. Pohorilyi. [In Ukrainian]. Kyiv: Osnovy. [=Вебер 1998]
Weber, M. (2012). Economy and Society. Transl. from German by M. Kushnir. [In Ukrainian]. Kyiv: Vsesvit. [=Вебер 2012]
Yermolenko, A. (2010). Social ethics and ecology. Human dignity — respect for nature. [In Ukrai- nian]. Kyiv: Libra. [=Єрмоленко, 2010]
Yermolenko, A., Raida, K. (1987). Transformed forms of social rationality. Critique of bourgeois concepts. [In Russian]. Kyiv: Naukova dumka. [=Єрмоленко, Райда, 1987]
Zdravomyslov, A. (1980). Weber’s sociology and modern ideological struggle. [In Russian]. In: Critics of modern bourgeois and reformist falsifiers of Marxism-Leninism (pp. 374–401). Moscow: Politizdat. [=Здравомыслов, 1980]
Downloads
-
PDF (Українська)
Downloads: 174
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
