Global bioethics in european context
LABORATORY OF MODERN HUMANITIES
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15407/fd2024.02.117Keywords:
global bioethics, bioethical principles, biomedical ethics, respect for human dignity, European bioethics, European ethosAbstract
The article analyses the foundations and principles of global bioethics in the European ethical, legal and philosophical contexts. An analysis of European bioethics shows that there are at least three modern models of European bioethics: bioethics as metaethics; bioethics as biolaw; bioethics as applied biomedical ethics. European bioethics originates in the global bioethics of V.R. Potter and F. Jahr, and encompasses not only moral issues of medicine and public health, but also global environmental and social problems. In this context, the convergence of the natural and the human is seen as a rehabilitation of practical philosophy, a further study and development of the principles of practical reason, understood by analogy with the objective laws of nature. The study of constitutions, legislative and legal regulations of European countries has revealed a variety of bioethical principles in the field of biomedicine. However, at the level of legislation in biomedicine, there is a certain influence of the American model of bioethics, biomedical ethics, which is manifested in the principlism methodology and the weak connection between medical and environmental issues. Global bioethics in the European context is characterized by an intensification of bioethical reflection, social relationships and legislative activity in biomedicine within pan-European structures, such as the European Council and the European Union. The defining feature of global bioethics as a phenomenon of European culture and ethos is that its principles can be “activated” only as a semantic and logical integrity. Bioethical principles serve as a kind of harmonising factor of European biopolitics.
References
An overview report on bioethics in the European Union. (2009). Brussels: Commission of the Bishops' Conferences of the European Community.
Basic Ethical Principles in European Bioethics and Biolaw. Autonomy, Dignity, Integrity and Vulnerability (2000). (Ed. by Rendtorf, J.D., Kemp, P.). Vol. 1. Guissona: Impremta Barnola.
Basic Ethical Principles in European Bioethics and Biolaw. Partner's Research. (2000). (Ed. by Rendtorf, J.D., Kemp, P.). Vol. 2. Guissona: Impremta Barnola.
Beauchamp, T.L., Childress, J.F. (1994). Principles of Biomedical Ethics. New York, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Beever, J., Whitehouse, P.J. (2017). The Ecosystem of Bioethics: Building Bridges to Public Health. JAHR, 8/2(16), 227.
https://doi.org/10.21860/j.8.2.5
Beever, J. & Morar, N. (2013). Perspectives in Bioethics, Science, and Public Policy. West Lafayette: Purdue University Press.
https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctt6wq3k3
Castells, M. (2000). End of Millenium. The Information Age: Economy, Society and Culture, 3. Maiden/Oxford: Blackwell.
Chiarelli, B. (2014). The bioecological bases of global bioethics. Global Bioethics, 25(1), 19-26.
https://doi.org/10.1080/11287462.2014.897068
Dekker, W. (2004). The New European Union: A Challenge to Bioethics. Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy, 7, 135-136.
Dwyer, J. (2009). How to connect bioethics and environmental ethics: health, sustainability, and justice. Wiley. Online library. Retrieved from: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/j.1467-8519.2009.01759.x
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8519.2009.01759.x
Europe - an unfinished project? Roundtable of the 'Filosofs'ka Dumka'. (2017). [In Ukrainian]. Filosofs'ka Dumka, 5, 10-20.
Hattingh, J. (2014). Protection of the Environment, the Biosphere and Biodiversity. In: Handbook of Global Bioethics. (Ed. by Ten Have H.A.M.J., Gordijn, B.) (pp. 115-250). New York; London: Springer.
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-2512-6_80
Gordijn, B., Ten Have, H. (2014). Future Perspectives. In: Handbook of Global Bioethics. (Ed. by Ten Have, H.A.M.J., Gordijn, B.) (pp. 829-844). New York; London: Springer.
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-2512-6_131
Garcia, D. (2014). History of Global Bioethics. Handbook of Global Bioethics. (Ed. by Ten Have H.A.M.J., Gordijn, B.) (pp. 19-34). New York; London: Springer.
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-2512-6_64
Gruen, L., Ruddick, W. (2009). Biomedical and Environmental Ethics Alliance: Common Causes and Grounds. Journal of Bioethical Inquiry, 6(4), 457-466.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11673-009-9198-6
Handbook of Global Bioethics. (2014). (Ed. by Ten Have, H.A.M.J., Gordijn, B.). New York; London: Springer.
Jonas, H. (1984). The Іmperative of Responsibility. In search of an ethics for the technological age. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Jordan, B. (1993). Voyage Autour du Genome. Le Tour du Mond en 80 Laboratories. Paris: INSERM.
Jahr, F. 1927. Bio-Ethik: Eine Umschau über die ethischen Beziehungen des Menschen
zu Tier und Pflanze. Kosmos 24(1):2-4.
Jahr, F. 1927. Bio-Ethik: Eine Umschau über die ethischen Beziehungen des Menschen
zu Tier und Pflanze. Kosmos 24(1):2-4.
Jahr, F. 1927. Bio-Ethik: Eine Umschau über die ethischen Beziehungen des Menschen
zu Tier und Pflanze. Kosmos 24(1):2-4.
Jahr, F. (1927). Bio-Ethik: Eine Umchau uber die ethischen Beziehungen des Menschen zu Tier and Pflanze. Kosmos, 24(1), 2-4.
Macklin, R. (2022). A new definition for global bioethics: COVID-19, a case study. Global Bioethics, 33(1), 4-13.
https://doi.org/10.1080/11287462.2021.2011001
McIntyre, A. (1980). After Virtue: A Study in Moral Theory. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press.
Meyer-Abich, K.-M. (2004). Revolution for Nature: From the Environment to the Connatural World. [In Ukrainian]. Кyiv: Libra.
Morales-González, A., Tirado-Lule, J.M., González-Cisneros, A., López-De-León, E.O., Sanchez-Morales, A. & Manzanilla-Granados, H.M. (2017). Bioethics in Education. Reflections on Bioethics. (Ed. by Morales-González, J.A. & Aguilar Nájera, M.E.). IntechOpen. http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.74519
https://doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.74519
Muzur, A. (2017). European Bioethics: A New History Guaranteeing a New Future. Soc. ekol. Zagreb, 26(1-2), 61-70.
https://doi.org/10.17234/SocEkol.26.1.5
Muzur, A., Rinčic, I. (2017). The Oviedo Convention and (European) bioethics: how much do they really have in common? Letter to editor. JAHR, 8/2(16), 245-249.
Ortiz-Millán, G. (2022). Bioethics, globalization and pandemics. Global Bioethics, 33(1), 32-37.
https://doi.org/10.1080/11287462.2021.2011006
Pessini, L. (2018). Global Bioethics at a Time of Uncertainly, Perplexity and Hope. Rome: Generalate.
Potter, V.R. (1971). Bioethics: bridge to the future. New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.
Potter, V.R. (1988). Global bioethics. Building on the Leopold Legacy. Michigan: Michigan State University Press.
Potter, V.R. (2001). Moving the culture toward more vivid utopias with survival as the goal. Global Bioethics, 14(4), 19-30.
https://doi.org/10.1080/11287462.2001.10800810
Proleiev, S. (2017). Self-denial of modern Europe: Europe of values versus Europe of interests. (Europe - an unfinished project? Roundtable of the 'Filosofs'ka Dumka'). [In Ukrainian]. Filosofs'ka Dumka, 5, 9-16.
Proleiev, S., Shamrai, V. (2020). Globalization and singularity: transformation of the foundations of modern society. [In Ukrainian]. Filosofs'ka Dumka, 5, 87-116.
https://doi.org/10.15407/fd2020.05.087
Pustovit, S.V. (2009). Global Bioethics: Coming into Being of Theory and Practice (philosophical analysis). [In Russian]. Kyiv: Arktur-A.
Pustovit, S.V. (2023). Origins and conceptual foundations of V.R. Potter's global bioethics. [In Ukrainian]. Humanities: a collection of scientific papers, 15(92), 44-51.
Quintana, O. (1993). International bioethics? The role of the Council of Europe. Journal of Medical Ethics, 19, 5-6.
https://doi.org/10.1136/jme.19.1.5
Richie, C. (2022). Introduction. Global Bioethics, 33(2), 1-3.
https://doi.org/10.1080/11287462.2021.2011000
Ricoeur, P. (2002). Law and Justice. [In Ukrainian]. Kyiv: Dukh i Litera.
Ricoeur, P. (2004). What Should the Ethos of New Europe Be Like? [In Ukrainian]. Dukh i Litera, 13-14, 188-198.)
Steger, M. (2013). Globalization. A Very Short Introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
https://doi.org/10.1093/actrade/9780199662661.001.0001
Ten Have, H. (2019). Global bioethics: an introduction. Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics, 40, 63-66.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11017-018-9455-y
Ten Have, H. (2022a). Bioethics аfter Covid. The Covid-19 Pandemic and Global Bioethics. AGBIO, 18, 225-271.
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-91491-2_9
Ten Have, H. (2022b). The challenges of global bioethics. Global Bioethics, 33(1), 41-44.
https://doi.org/10.1080/11287462.2021.2011008
Ten Have, H. & Gordijn, B. (2013). The diversity of bioethics. Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy, 16(4), 635-637.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11019-013-9505-1
Tong, R. (2022). Towards a feminist global ethics. Global Bioethics, 33(1), 32-37.
https://doi.org/10.1080/11287462.2021.2011002
Europe - an unfinished project? Roundtable of the 'Filosofs'ka Dumka'. (2017). [In Ukrainian]. Filosofs'ka Dumka, 5, 10-20.
Trynova, Y.O., Anishchenko, M., Кyrbiatiev, O., Zelenskyi, Y., Karpenko, A. (2023). Global bioethics and implementation of its principles in the criminal legislation of the countries of the continental law family. Sortuz. Oñati Journal of Emergent Socio-legal Studies, 13(1), 69-90.
Valdes, E. (2021). Biolaw: Origins, Doctrine and Juridical Application on the Bioscience. Cham: Springer.
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-71823-7
Whitehous, P.J. (2003). The rebirth of bioethics: extending the original formulations of Van Rensselaer Potter. Am. J. of Bioeth, Autumn, 3(4), W26-W31.
Downloads
-
PDF
Downloads: 28
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).