On urgency of the concept of “backward nation”

Authors

  • Anatolii Loy

Keywords:

backward nation, political humanism, national state, great-statehood, empire, nation

Abstract

The idea of “backward nation” was introduced by H. Plessner and represented in the title of his well known book. It was use for characteristic of pathology of political process, inherent in pre-war Germany in difference to its neighbors. A characteristic feature of “the history of German spirit” was the absence of the steady tradition of national statehood on the basis of political humanism, which is inherent in the legal principles of the institutional life of the society. Simultaneously, the stable orientation the national-state organization of the social life had been formed in the West-European countries in the 16–17th centuries, small German principalities dreamt of uniting into the renewed variant of the Holy Empire of the German nation. The illusions which concerned uniting the ideas of empire and national state continued existing in Germany of the time of Bismarck and were strengthened after the defeat in the World War I, when the accent was made on the national empire, its great-power attempt. Mystification of greatness of the nation, its language, rites and culture is inscribed in such orientation. The tragic consequences of realization of such orientation are generally known. Russia, its social consciousness, in its own way, also suffers from the longing for being simultaneously the national state and empire. The disposition towards the great-statehood, inherited from Mongols, dominates in Russian mentality. The absence of traditions of institutional self-organization of the society on the legal principles determines the anti-western frame of mind, then hampers the potentialities of political modernization of society, makes it one more variant of the backward nation.

Author Biography

Anatolii Loy

доктор філософських наук, член редколеґії часопису «Філософська думка»

References

Eder K. Geschichte als Lernprozeß? Zur Pathogenese politischer Modernität in Deutschland. — Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp Verlag, 1985.

Birk H.-J. Kann Deutschland als verspätete Nation bezeichnet werden? — München: GRIN Verlag, 2010.

Plessner H. Analyse des deutschen Selbstbewußtseins // Gesammelte Schriften. Bd.6. — Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, s.a. — S.254.

Plessner H. Die verspätete Nation. Über die politische Verführbarkeit bürgerlichen Geistes (1935/1959) // Gesammelte Schriften, Bd. 6. — Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, s.a. — S.50.

Haucke K. Das liberale Ethos der Würde: Eine systematisch orientierte Problemgeschichte zu Helmuth Plessners Begriff menschlicher Würde in den Grenzen der Gemeinschaft. — Würzburg: Königshausen&Neumann, 2003.

Plessners ‘Grenzen der Gemeischaft’. Eine Debatte. — Hrgb. von W. Eßbach, J. Fischer und H. Lethen. — Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, 2002.

Bialas W. Politischer Humanismus und «Verspätete Nation». Helmuth Plessners Ausein andersetzung mit Deutschland und National-Sozialismus. — Schriften des Hannah Arendt-Institut für Totalitarismusforschung, Bd. 42. — Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht GmbH & Co. KG, 2010.

Winkler H.A. Der lange Weg nach Westen. Bd.1-2. — München: C.H.Beck, 2000.

Winkler H.A. Gehören wir noch Westen? // Die Welt, 12.06.2011.

Арендт Х. Джерела тоталітаризму. — Київ: ДУХ І ЛІТЕРА, 2002.

Rojek P. Coniec imperium // Do Reczy, 17.11.2014.

Downloads

Abstract views: 153

Published

2017-05-02

How to Cite

Loy, A. (2017). On urgency of the concept of “backward nation”. Filosofska Dumka, (2), 72–93. Retrieved from https://dumka.philosophy.ua/index.php/fd/article/view/82

Metrics