THE RUSSIAN-UKRAINIAN WAR AS A CHALLENGE TO THE IMPERATIVE “HUMAN DIGNITY – RESPECT FOR NATURE”
Keywords:
discourse, responsibility, war, human dignity, respect for nature, сonnatural world, connatural universe, global catastrophe, value-normative orderAbstract
The article examines moral and ecological problems in the context of the Russian-Ukrainian war as a challenge to the imperative “human dignity – respect for nature”. In particular, the author discusses the predictions of prominent contemporary philosophers (K.-O. Apel, H. Jonas, H. Küng, etc.) regarding risks of a global ecological catastrophe, as well as their warnings about the possibility of the destruction of humanity as a result of a global nuclear war. Putting forward the concepts of “rehabilitation of practical philosophy”, according to which moral and ethical affiliations would become the unifying factor between man and the environment, they directed their efforts towards the scientific substantiation and practical formation of a new moral and ethical and political and legal world order as a value-normative safeguard against global catastrophe. The article notes that the Russian-Ukrainian war, aimed not only at the destruction of Ukrainians as an ethnic group, but also at the destruction of their natural and cultural environment, is not only genocide, but also ecocide of the Ukrainian people.
The text also states that the Russian authorities, by placing current Russian legislation above international law, violate not only agreements that regulate relations between states, but also international agreements on environmental protection. The concept of the “Connatural World” of both man nature as a “Related Universe” is proposed in the article as a methodological paradigm in solving global environmental problems. It is also considered as a factor in the rehabilitation of the significance of moral and ethical belongings, which are motivating components of achieving victory in the Russian-Ukrainian war and restoring their cultural and natural environment by Ukrainians.
References
Böhler, D. (2014). Responsibility for the Future from a Global Perspective. The Relevance of Hans Jonas' Philosophy and Discourse Ethics / Transl. from Germ., afterword, notes by A. Yermolenko. [In Ukrainian]. Kyiv: Stylos.
Böhler, D. (2023). Politische Verantwortung – nicht länger verschlaffen und verscholzen! Wir hätten es besser wissen können und müssen. In: Diskursverantwortung in Krisen- und Kriegszeiten. Erstes Bad Kissinger Symposion des Hans Jonas-Zentrums e.V. – 30 Jahre nach der Berliner Ehrenpromotion von Hans Jonas: 11. bis 13. Juni 2022. Bad Kissingen / Hrsg. von D. Böhler, H. Asel, B. Herrmann (SS. 107–113). Baden-Baden: Alber.
Böhler, D. (2023). Response to the Appeal of Peter Brandt, Rainer Brauns and Other Supporters of German Pacifism / Transl. from Germ. by A. Yermolenko. [In Ukrainian]. Philosophical Thought, 2, 73.
Böhler, D. (2023а). Was sagt Jonas‘ “Heuristik der Furcht” angesichts der Atombombe? Antwort auf Alfons Matheis‘ Frage. In: Diskursverantwortung in Krisen- und Kriegszeiten / Hrsg. von D. Böhler, H. Asel, B. Herrmann (SS. 170–171). Baden-Baden: Alber.
Brandt, P., Braun, R. (2023). Appell an Scholz “Die Welt braucht Frieden”. Tagesschau, 01.04.2023. Retrieved from: www.tagesschau.de › inland › friedensinitiative-ukraine-101
Criminal Code of Ukraine. (2025). [In Ukrainian]. Kyiv: Pravo.
Glucksmann, A. (1993). The Eleventh Commandment / Transl. from French by O. Shevchenko, Ye. Yeremenko. [In Ukrainian]. Kyiv: Dukh i Litera.
Habermas, J. (2022). Krieg und Empörung. Das Dilemma des Westen. Sueddeutsche Zeitung, 1. Mai. Retrieved from: https://www.sueddeutsche.de/projekte/artikel/kultur/das-dilemma-des-westens-juergen-habermas-zum-krieg-in-der-ukraine-e068321/?reduced=true
Habermas, J. (2023). Ein Plädoyer für Verhandlungen. Sueddeutsche Zeitung, 14. Februar. Retrieved from: https://www.sueddeutsche.de/projekte/artikel/kultur/juergen-habermas-ukraine-sz-verhandlungen-e159105/?reduced=true&fbclid=IwAR3tuDT8l4YtUi-mkGH5RPztnKeCWRPp0QZAX4M_hORL4Th6DXHO1t8SNnI
Hösle, V. (2022). Mit dem Rücken zu Russland. Der Ukrainekrieg und die Fehler des Westens. Baden-Baden: Alber.
Jonas, H. (2001). The Principle of Responsibility. In Search of Ethics for Technological Civilization / Transl. from Germ. by A. Yermolenko, V. Yermolenko. [In Ukrainian]. Kyiv: Libra.
Kant, I. (1977). Grundlegung zur Metaphysik der Sitten. In: I. Kant, Werke in zwölf Bänden / Hrsg. von W. Weischedel (Bd. 7, SS. 11–112). Frankfurt a. M.: Suhrkamp. [Immanuel Kant: Grundlegung zur Metaphysik der Sitten, Digitale Bibliothek Sonderband: Kant: Werke (cf. Kant-W Bd. 7)].
Kant, I. (1977а). Metaphysik der Sitten. In: I. Kant, Werke in zwölf Bänden. / Hrsg. von W. Weischedel (Bd. 8, SS. 307–645). Frankfurt a. M.: Suhrkamp. [Immanuel Kant: Die Metaphysik der Sitten, Digitale Bibliothek Sonderband: Kant: Werke].
Kant, I. (1977b). Zum ewigen Frieden. Ein philosophischer Entwurf, Digitale Bibliothek Sonderband: Kant: Werke (Bd. 11, SS. 195–265) (cf. Kant-W Bd. ).
Leisinger, K. (2023). Heuristik der Furcht als Entscheidungshilfe im geschäftlichen Handeln. In: Diskursverantwortung in Krisen- und Kriegszeiten / Hrsg. von D. Böhler, H. Asel, B. Herrmann (SS. 189–213). Baden-Baden: Alber.
Mayer-Abich, K.M. (2004). Revolution for Nature: From the Environment to the Connatural World / Transl. from Germ., afterword by A. Yermolenko. [In Ukrainian]. Kyiv: Libra.
Müller M., Brandt P., Braun R. (2022). Selbstvernichtung oder Gemeinsame Sicherheit. Unser Jahrzehnt der Extreme: Ukraine-Krieg und Klimakrise. Frankfurt аm Main: Westend Verlag GmbH.
Müller, M., Brandt, P., Braun, R. (2022). Selbstvernichtung oder Gemeinsame Sicherheit. Unser Jahrzehnt der Extreme: Ukraine-Krieg und Klimakrise. Frankfurt а. Main: Westend Verlag GmbH.
Skovoroda, H. (2016). Conversation, called the alphabet, or the world's primer. [In Russian]. In: H. Skovoroda, Complete academic collection of works / Ed. by L. Ushkalov. 2nd edn., (pp. 645–728). Kharkiv: Publisher Savchuk O.O.
Stegnii, O. (2022). Socio-ecological risks of the Russian-Ukrainian war. [In Ukrainian]. In: S. Dembitsky, O. Zlobina, N. Kostenko et al., Ukrainian society during the war. 2022: Collective monograph / Ed. by Ye. Golovakha, S. Makeiev (pp. 77–88). Kyiv: Institute of Sociology, NAS of Ukraine.
Weizsäcker, E.U. von, Wijkman, A. (2017). Wir sind dran. Club of Rome: Der große Bericht. Gütersloher Verlagshaus
Yermolenko, A. (2010). Social Ethics and Ecology: Human Dignity – Respect for Nature. [In Ukrainian]. Kyiv: Libra.
Yermolenko, A. (2021). Discourse. Communication. Morality. [In Ukrainian]. Kyiv: Naukova Dumka.
Yermolenko, A. (2021a). “Russian World” – the ideology of Russian imperialism. [In Ukrainian]. In: “Russian World” as a doctrine: origins, threats, methods. Philosophical Dialogues (iss. 21–22, pp. 15–26). Kyiv: H.S. Skovoroda Institute of Philosophy, NAS of Ukraine.
Yermolenko, A. (2022). Widerstand statt Verhandlung. Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung, 23. Mai, 1–8.
Yermolenko, A. (2023). Ukraine and the world after 02/24/2022: a year of invincibility, a year of consolidation. [In Ukrainian]. Philosophical Thought, 2, 7–13.
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
