The Invention of Subjectivity and the Philosophy of Suspicion. Part 1. The Invention of Subjectivity, or The Taming of Dionysus

Authors

Keywords:

anthropology, Aristotle, being, soul, life, human being, Martin Heidegger, non-being, Protagoras, René Descartes, death, Socrates, subjectivity, Friedrich Nietzsche

Abstract

The first part “The Invention of Subjectivity, or the Taming of Dionysus” of the article “The Invention of Subjectivity and the Philosophy of Suspicion” deals with the formation of the modern concept of subjectivity in European intellectual tradition from antiquity to the present day. According to the author, this process begins with an event that can be called an anthropological turn in ancient philosophy. This event occurs primarily thanks to Socrates and the Sophists. Here, first of all, it is worth recalling the statement of Protagoras “Of all things the measure is Man, of the things that are, that they are, and of the things that are not, that they are not”, which leads not so much to epistemological relativism as to the fact that, from then on, the attention of ancient thinkers was focused on the phenomenon of man. Despite Socrates' criticism of the Sophists, this motif of their philosophy obviously remains important for his thinking. An important moment in this process was Aristotle's creation of the concept of “ύποκείμενον”, which was translated into Latin as “subjectum” and, through Latin, entered all modern European languages, including Ukrainian, in the form of the concept of “subject.” The next step in the formation of the modern concept of subjectivity is the Christian doctrine of the immortality of the soul. Relevant to the topic of the study are the interpretation of the experience of the first Christians in Friedrich Nietzsche's The Dawn of Day and the description of the impact of the destruction of the ancient political system on the formation of ideas of eternity and immortality in Hannah Arendt's Human Condition. The principle of subjectivity finally established in the philosophy of René Descartes, namely in his statement “Ego cogito ergo sum” and reaches its apogee in Immanuel Kant's transcendentalism in the form of the transcendental unity of self-consciousness. But almost immediately, the principle of subjectivity is criticized, as discussed in the second part of the article.

Author Biography

Vakhtang KEBULADZE

Doctor of Sciences in Philosophy, Professor, Department of Theoretical and Practical Philosophy, Faculty of Philosophy, Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv, 64/13, Volodymyrska St., Kyiv, 01601

References

Arendt, G. (1999). The Human Condition. [In Ukrainian]. Lviv: Litopys.

Brentano, F. (1973). Psychologie vom empirischen Standpunkt. Erster Band. Hamburg: Felix Meiner Verlag.

Descartes, R. (2000). Metaphysical Reflections / Tr. from French. by Z. Borisiuk, O. Zhupanskyi. [In Ukrainian]. Kyiv: Univers.

European Dictionary of Philosophies: a Lexicon of Untranslatables. Vol. 1. (2009). [In Ukrainian]. Kyiv: Dukh i Litera.

European Dictionary of Philosophies: a Lexicon of Untranslatables. Vol. 4. (2016). [In Ukrainian]. Kyiv: Dukh i Litera.

Heidegger, M. (1997). Nieztsche. Zweiter Band. In: M. Heidegger, Gesamtausgabe. I Abteilung: Veröffentliche Schriften 1910–1976. Bd. 6.2. Frankfurt am Main: Vittorio Klostermann.

Husserl, E. (1966). Zur Phänomenologie des inneren Zeitbewusstseins (1893–1917). In: Husserliana, Bd. X / Hrsg. von R. Boehm. Den Haag: Martinus Nijhoff.

Kant, I. (1995). Kritik der reinen Vernunft. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.

Kebuladze, V. (2020). Phenomenology of experience. [In Ukrainian]. Kyiv: Dukh i Litera.

Nietzsche, F. (2018). Morning Dawn / Tr. from Germ. by V. Kebuladze. [In Ukrainian]. Kyiv: Tempora.

Nieztsche, F. (1988). Menschliche, Allzumenschliche I und II. Ein Buch für freie Geister. In: F. Nieztsche, Kritische Studienausgabe, Bd. 2 / Hrsg. von G. Colli, M. Montinari. München: Deutscher Taschenbuch Verlag; Berlin / New York: Walter de Gruyter.

Patočka, J. (2001). Negative Platonism. Eternity and historicity. Heretical Essays on the Philosophy of History / Tr. from Czech by B. Marusyk, O. Kosenko, H. Syvachenko, I. Melnichenko. [In Ukrainian]. Kyiv: Osnovy.

Ricoer, P. (1969). Le conflit des interprétations. Essais d’herméneutique. Paris: Editions du Seuil.

Scheler, M. (1976). Mensch und Geschichte. In: M. Scheler, Gesammelte Werke, Bd. 9. Späte Schriften. Bern / München: Franke Verlag.

St. Augustine. (1999). Confession / Tr. from Lat. by Yu. Mushaka. [In Ukrainian]. Kyiv: Osnovy.

Abstract views: 4

Published

2025-12-10

How to Cite

KEBULADZE, V. . (2025). The Invention of Subjectivity and the Philosophy of Suspicion. Part 1. The Invention of Subjectivity, or The Taming of Dionysus. Filosofska Dumka, (4), 99–117. Retrieved from https://dumka.philosophy.ua/index.php/fd/article/view/858

Metrics

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 3 4 5 > >>