DAVIDSON’S TRIANGULATION AND ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE: SEMIOTICS OF DIGITAL SUBJECTIVITY

Authors

Keywords:

triangulation, Donald Davidson, artificial intelligence, digital subjectivity, Swampman, social reality, radical interpretation, epistemic situation

Abstract

The article explores the transformation of Artificial Intelligence (AI) from a mere instrumental tool into an autonomous mediator through the lens of Donald Davidson’s epistemological concept of triangulation. The relevance of the study is driven by the necessity for a philosophical reflection on Large Language Models (LLMs), wich presuppose considering them not merely as algorithmic systems but as potential subjects of communication. This shift requires a re-evaluation of propositional attitude categories, such as beliefs, intentions, and desires. The scientific novelty lies in the juxtaposition of Davidsonian "triangular externalism" (Self–Other–World) with contemporary issues of digital subjectivity. By referencing the "Swampman" thought experiment, the author argues that without historical genesis and a causal connection to a shared world, AI risks remaining a "semantic zombie." In contrast to W. Quine’s approach, Davidson’s strategy asserts that objectivity of knowledge arises only through intersubjective interaction; consequently, understanding truth becomes possible solely through language as a form of social triangulation. Within the scope of the study, a parallel is drawn with the fictional image of the robot Klara from Kazuo Ishiguro's novel as a late model of Davidsonian triangulation, where ethical subjectivity emerges through an attempt to interpret the human context. Particular attention is paid to the logical structure of radical interpretation and the adaptation of Alfred Tarski’s theory of truth. The author demonstrates that the meaning of sentences in AI systems remains "semantically opaque" without engagement in a shared symbolic space. The conclusions emphasize that the transition from mobile to ambient computing requires AI to possess more than just precision; it demands the capacity for the "cognitive utilization of the three-way link." It is established that attributing propositional attitudes to AI is often a result of human anthropomorphism, whereas genuine subjectivity requires a history of interaction with humans. The article proposes regarding triangulation as a fundamental model for developing human-machine systems, where ethical responsibility and meaningful communication become possible only within the "closed triangle" of a shared objective reality.

Author Biography

Olena ASTAPOVA-VYAZMINA

PhD, Associate Professor at the Department of Philosophical, Political and Psychological Studies, Cherkasy State Technological University, 480, bulv. Shevchenka, Cherkasy, 1800, WoS Research ID: PIJ-2547-2026

References

Ashouri-Kisomi, M. A., Parvizi. M. & Momeni, S.M.H. (2025). Pragmatism, the Ethics of Artificial Intelligenceand Sociotechnical Systems. Journal of Philosophical Investigations, 19(52), 281–300. https://doi.org/10.22034/jpiut.2025.66643.4060

Borradori, G. (1995). The American Philosopher: Conversations with Quine, Davidson, Putnam, Nozick, Danto, Rorty, Cavell, MacIntyre, Kuhn. Chicago, London: The University of Chicago Press.

Chalmers, D.J. (2025). Propositional Interpretability in Artificial Intelligence.

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2501.15740

Davidson, D. (1987). Epistemology Externalized. In: Subjective, Intersubjective, Objective (pp. 193–204). Oxford: Clarendon Press.

Davidson, D. (1987). Knowing One’s Own Mind. In: Subjective, Intersubjective, Objective (pp. 15–38). Oxford: Clarendon Press

Davidson, D. (2001). Mental Events. Retrieved from: https://divinecuration.github.io/assets/pdf/davidson-mental-events.pdf

Davidson, D. (1992). The Second Person. In: Subjective, Intersubjective, Objective. (pp. 107–122). Oxford: Clarendon Press.

Davidson, D. (1992). Three Varieties of Knowledge. In: Subjective, Intersubjective, Objective. (pp. 205–220). Oxford: Clarendon Press.

Davidson, D. (2001). Subjective, Intersubjective, Objective. Oxford: Clarendon Press

De Caro, M. (2011). Davidson's Externalism. The Short Happy Life of the Swampman: Interpretation and Social Externalism in Davidson. Retrieved from: https://www.academia.edu/6549574/Davidsons_Externalism

Harnad, S. (1990). The Symbol Grounding Problem. https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-2789%2890%2990087-6

Malpas, J. (1992). Donald Davidson and the Mirror of Meaning: Holism, Truth, Interpretation. Cambridge University Press.

Mendozza, A. (2025). Don’t Believe the Believe Hype! Retrieved from: https://openreview.net/pdf?id=mCPn3aqf5U

Millikan, R.G. (1996). On Swampkinds. Retrieved from: https://philosophy.uconn.edu/wp-content/uploads/sites/365/2014/02/On-Swampkinds.pdf

Myers, R.H., Verheggen, C. (2016). Donald Davidson’s Triangulation Argument: A Philosophical Inquiry. New York: Routledge.

Quandt, R.P. (2022). AI in Society: A theory. Front. Phys. Sec. Snterdisciplinary Physics. (vol. 10–22). https://doi.org/10.3389/fphy.2022.941824

Taschek, W. (2002). Making Sense of Others: Donald Davidson on Interpretation. Retrieved from: https://surl.li/cgcxzm

Watson, D.S., Mokander, J., Floridi, L. (2024). Competing narratives in AI ethics: a defense of sociotechnical pragmatism. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-024-02128-2

Zheng, Y. (2016). The Swampman Puzzle and Diachronic Holism. https://doi.org/10.1111/phil.12113

Abstract views: 0

Published

2026-03-28

How to Cite

ASTAPOVA-VYAZMINA, O. (2026). DAVIDSON’S TRIANGULATION AND ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE: SEMIOTICS OF DIGITAL SUBJECTIVITY. Filosofska Dumka, (1), 43–52. Retrieved from https://dumka.philosophy.ua/index.php/fd/article/view/878

Issue

Section

TOPIC OF THE ISSUE

Metrics

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.