Contemporary models of Philosophical education: Round-table sitting of Ukrainian Philosophical Fund and Department of Philosophy of Philosophical Faculty at Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv

Authors

  • Liudmyla Shashkova Київський національний університет ім. Тараса Шевченка
  • Serhii Secundant I. Mechnikov Odessa National University http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6724-4956
  • Mykola Symchych Skovoroda’s Institute of Philosophy, the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7826-3471
  • Volodymyr Bugrov Київський національний університет ім. Тараса Шевченка
  • Viktor Kozlovsky National University of “Kyiv-Mohyla Akademy” http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5656-8859

Keywords:

heuristic potential of philosophical thinking, place of philosophy in the structure of university education, philosophic specialities, cultural mission of philosophy, academic mobility, textological culture

Abstract

The subjects of consideration, theoretical discussions and development of practical reco mmendations at the round-table sitting were as follows: problems of modernization of the philosophical education in Ukraine for realization of the heuristic attempt of philosophical thought; revision of place and role of philosophy in the structure of contemporary university education as a whole; philosophy’s response to modern challenges; today’s cultural mission of philosophy; tendency to minimization of philosophy influence on the content and orientation of education; prospects of philosophic specialities, etc. Isolation from the world philosophic community is the main cause of negative phenomena in the development of home philosophy. The worldwide adopted principles of existence of the philosophic community presuppose a higher academic mobility; development of textological culture; renovation of educational courses on the basis of the world achievements; adaptation of the philosophic courses for non-philosophic faculties; getting out of formalism in defining scientific criteria, etc.

Author Biographies

Liudmyla Shashkova, Київський національний університет ім. Тараса Шевченка

доктор філософських наук, професор, завідувач кафедри філософії

Serhii Secundant, I. Mechnikov Odessa National University

doctor of sciences in philosophy, associated professor of Department of Philosophy and Grounds of Humanities

Mykola Symchych, Skovoroda’s Institute of Philosophy, the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine

PhD in philosophy, research fellow at the Department of the History of Ukrainian Philosophy

Volodymyr Bugrov, Київський національний університет ім. Тараса Шевченка

кандидат філософських наук, професор, проректор з науково-педагогічної роботи, завідувач кафедри історії філософії філософського факультету

Viktor Kozlovsky, National University of “Kyiv-Mohyla Akademy”

PhD in philosophy, associate professor of the Department of Philosophy and Religious studies

Downloads

Abstract views: 269

Published

2017-05-09

How to Cite

Shashkova, L., Secundant, S., Symchych, M., Bugrov, V., & Kozlovsky, V. (2017). Contemporary models of Philosophical education: Round-table sitting of Ukrainian Philosophical Fund and Department of Philosophy of Philosophical Faculty at Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv. Filosofska Dumka, (4), 5–23. Retrieved from https://dumka.philosophy.ua/index.php/fd/article/view/119

Issue

No. 4 (2014): PHILOSOPHICAL THOUGHT

Section

TOPIC OF THE ISSUE

Metrics

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

License

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

  • Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication.
  • Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
  • Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).