Identity, community, and political judgment


  • Yevhen Bystrytsky Інститут філософії ім. Г.С. Сковороди НАНУ


identity, life-world, political judgment, cosmopolitanism, community, reification, being-possibility


Is it possible to provide a “philosophical reduction” of extensively proliferating interpretations of the phenomenon of identity in humanities? Could the concept of ethno-cultural form of life serve as the end socio-anthropological correlate of its philosophical understanding through the notions of life-world, culture, a person of culture? Interpreting E. Ericson’s, A. Sen’s, K.A. Appiah’s, A. Maalouf’s, N. Sharansky’s and some other ideas the article responds in a positive way to the raised questions. At the same time it critisizes a trend of applying cosmopolitan view on the globalization process (A. Sen, J. Habermas) to analysis of the “end grounds” of the identity. The author refers to deliberated hermeneutical study of the “communitas” (Lat.) done by R. Esposito to join his conclusion on “no-thingness” of the “essence” or “communality” of community as identity of a collective subject. Using generalizations of B. Anderson as to “emagined nations” the author develops the view on identity as a way of being in terms of being-possibility, as well as through M. Heidegger's concept of ontological difference. Methodologically, such an approach can help to criticize various forms of reificationistic approaches in political judgments and in everyday life, i.e., under discriminating interpretations of identity through indication of the “negative features of national character”, biased reduction of communities and individuals to their bio-anthropological characteristics, etc.

Author Biography

Yevhen Bystrytsky, Інститут філософії ім. Г.С. Сковороди НАНУ

доктор філософських наук, в. о. завідувача відділу філософії культури, етики та естетики


Андерсон Б. Воображаемые сообщества. — Москва, 2001.

Бистрицький Є. Філософський образ культури і світ національного буття // Феномен української культури: методологічні засади осягнення. — Київ, 1996.

Быстрицкий Е. Конфликт культур и методология толерантности // Вопросы философии. — Москва, 2011. — № 9.

Гібернау М. Ідентичність націй. — Київ, 2012.

Донскіс Л. Збентежена ідентичність і сучасний світ. — Київ, 2010.

Хайдеггер М. Вещь и творение // М. Хайдеггер. Работы и размышления разных лет. — Москва, 1993.

Appiah K.A. The Ethics of Identity. — Princeton, NJ, 2005.

Arendt H. Responsibility and Judgment / Ed. by J. Kohn. — New York, 2003.

Arendt H. The Promise of Politics / Ed. by J. Kohn. — New York, 2005.

Esposito R. Communitas. The Origin and Destiny of Community. — Stanford University Press, 2010.

Gilbert P. Cultural Identity and Political Ethics. — Edinburgh University Press, 2010.

Habermas J. The Crisis of European Union. A Response. Polity Press. — Cambridge, 2012.

Heidegger M. The Basic Problems of Phenomenology / Transl. by A. Hofstadter. Revised Edition. — Indiana University Press, 1988.

Appiah K.A. Cosmopolitanism. Ethics in a World of Strangers. — New York; London, 2006.

Maalouf A. In the Name of Identity. Violence and the Need to Belong. London, 2000.

Multiculturalism and “The Politics of Recognition”. An Essay by Charles Taylor. — Princeton; Oxford, 1992.

Sen A. Identity and Violence. The Illusion of Destiny. — New York, 2006.

Sharansky N. Defending Identity. Its Indispensable Role in Protecting Democracy. Public Affairs. — New York, 2008.

Taylor Ch. Philosophical Arguments. — Cambridge; London, 1997.


Abstract views: 341



How to Cite

Bystrytsky, Y. (2017). Identity, community, and political judgment. Filosofska Dumka, (4), 41–61. Retrieved from



Download data is not yet available.