Revolution thesauri as a method of studying their sense dimension
Keywords:
semantics of event, semantics of social conflicts, semantic dimensions of social conflict, semantic wars, semantic confrontation, thesaurus of social conflict, dictionary of revolution, cultural semantics, social semantics, linguistic theory of conflictAbstract
The article continues the series of research, which aims to determine specific features of contemporary social conflicts and to develop relevant research methodology. Author proposes an object for such research (semantic dimension of conflicts) and a subject (semantic space as an area of semantic confrontation) and proposes to apply methods of cultural semantics to investigate it. Besides, creating thesauruses of social conflicts may be useful, while we understand thesaurus as a linguistic form of existence of cultural senses. Also, the author gives a brief review of 70 thesauruses of 11 social conflicts (including contemporary Ukrainian conflict) which have been published since early 1900s.References
A Dictionary of the Revolution: Documenting shifts in Egyptian Arabic since 25 January 2011. Retrieved from: http://www.qamosalthawra.com/english.html#mainTitle.
Chilton, P.A. (1985). Language and the nuclear arms debate: F. Pinter.
Klemperer, V. (1947). LTI — Lingua Tertii Imperii. Notizbuch eines Philologen. Berlin: Auflage; Aufbau-Verlag.
Lakoff, G. (1991). Metaphor and War: The Metaphor System Used to Justify War in the Gulf. Part I of II. In: Viet Nam Generation Journal, 3.
Lakoff, G. (2001). Metaphors of Terror. In: The Days After: essays written in the aftermath of September 11, 2001. University of Chicago Press.
Lasswell, H. D. (1938). Propaganda technique in the World War. New York: Peter Smith.
Leites, N. (1955). A Study of Bolshevism. In: The Journal of Politics, 2, Т. 17, 326–329.
Mazon, A. (1920). Lexique de la guerre et de la révolution en Russie (1914–1918). Paris.
Paris, R. (2002). Kosovo and the Metaphor War. In: Political Science Quarterly, 3 (117), 423–450. https://doi.org/10.2307/798263.
Sbârnă, G., Marin, V. (ed.) (2010). Dicţionar General al Revoluţiei Române. Bucureşti: Editura Militară.
Schiappa, E. (1989). The Rhetoric of Nukespeak. In: Communication Monographs, 56, 253–272. https://doi.org/10.1080/03637758909390263.
Bilchenko, Y. V. (2014). Semantic topos of Maidan: internal identities of Ukrainians between The. [In Ukrainian]. In: International Journal, «Culture. Philology. Musicology» Series, ІІ (3), 3–11. [= Більченко, 2014].
Vorobiova, H. (2015). Specifics of use of political metaphors during «Euromaidan». [In Ukrainian]. In: Actual problems of politics, 56, 181–190. [= Воробйова, 2015].
Haukhman, M. (2015). «Discourse of Revolution» of 1905, «Bloody Sunday» and «revolutionary spring» (by the example of Donbass). [In Ukrainian]. In: Ukraine Modern. Retrieved from: http://uamoderna.com/blogy/mikhailo-gaukhman/diskurs-revolyuczii-1905-roku [= Гаухман, 2015].
Huseinov, H. (2004). D.S.P. Soviet Ideologems in the Russian Discourse of the 1990s.. [In Russain]. Moscow: Three squares. [= Гусейнов, 2004].
Danylevska, O. (2009). Language in the revolution and the revolution in the language: the language policy of the Central Rada, Hetman, UNR Directory. [In Ukrainian]. Kyiv. [= Данилевська, 2009].
Demisheva, I. (2008). Metaphors in the discourse of of Viktor Yushchenko. [In Ukrainian]. In: Political management, 6, 151–159. [= Демішева, 2008].
Demchenko, V. M. (2015). Social semantics of words in a political context. [In Ukrainian]. In: Theory and practice of public administration and local government, 2. [= Демченко, 2015].
Derzhavin, K. (1927). The struggle of classes and parties in the language of the Great French Revolution. [In Russian]. In: Language and Literature, 1 (2), 1–62. [= Державин, 1927].
Zhabotynska, S.A. (2015). Language as weapon in the war of worldviews. Maidan — Antimaidan: A thesaurus of lexical innovations (Online edition). [In Russian]. Kyiv: UACLiP. [= Жаботинська, 2015].
Zolian, S. (1994). Description of regional conflict as a methodological problem. [In Russian]. In: Polis, 2, 131–142. [= Золян, 1994].
Kaganovich, B.N. (2000). The language of French Revolution: On the unpublished book of Derzhavin. [In Russian]. In: French Yearbook 2000: 200 years of the French Revolution of 1789—1799: The results of the jubileeMoscow, Editorial URSS. [= Каганович, 2000].
Kartsevskiy, S. I. (1923). Language, War and Revolution. [In Russian]. In: Russian University Press. [= Карцевский, 1923].
Korabliov, A. (2006). Rhetoric and Mythopoetics of the Ukrainian Revolution. [In Russian]. In: Wild lea. Donetsk project. Retrieved from http://www.dikoepole.org/blog_autor.php?a=1&id_blog=3 [= Кораблев, 2006].
Masenko, L. (ed.) (2005). Ukrainian language in the XXth century: history of lingvocide. Documents and papers. [In Ukrainian]. Kyiv: Kyiv-Mohyla Academy Press. [= Масенко, 2005].
Osokina, S.A. (2010). Thesaurus as the Information Net of Culture. [In Russian]. In: Journal of Altai State University, 1-2, 126–133. [= Осокина, 2010].
Panov, M. (ed.) (1968). Russian language and Soviet society (sociological-linguistic research). [In Russian]. Kyiv: Nauka (Science) [= Панов, 1968].
Rudnichenko, N. (2011). Semantics Ukrainian protest movement. [In Ukrainian]. In: Young Nation [= Рудніченко, 2011].
Sarnov, B. (2005). Our Soviet newspeak: tiny encyclopedia of real socialism. [In Russian]. Moscow: EKSMO. [= Сарнов, 2005].
Selischev, A. (1928). The language of the revolutionary age. [In Russian]. Moscow. [= Селищев, 1928].
Semkiv, R. (2016). Satire and humor in the discourse of the Revolution of Dignity. [In Ukrainian]. In: Philosophical Thought, 4, 118–122. [= Семків, 2016].
The dictionary of the revolution (1977). [In Russian]. Kyiv: Molod’ (Youth). [= Словник революції, 1977].
Trach, N. (2015). «Together — the power»: The rhetoric of Ukrainian resistance. [In Ukrainian]. Kyiv: Clio. [= Трач, 2015].
Shanskiy, N.M. (1987). Words born by October. Book for students. [In Russian]. Moscow. Pro svieshchenie (Enlightenment). [= Шанский, 1987].
Shevchenko, O. (2016). Words-phanthoms in propagandist discourse of Ukrainian authorities. [In Ukrainian]. Philosophical Thought, 1, 56–63. [= Шевченко, 2016].
Yasna, I., Bekeshkina, I. et al. (2016). Discourse of the Revolution of Dignity: соntent, structure, research methodology. [In Ukrainian]. In: Philosophical Thought, 4, 6–56. [= Ясна, Бекешкіна, Верстюк та ін., 2016].
Downloads
-
PDF (Українська)
Downloads: 142
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).