Martin Heidegger: embeddedness in tradition. Xenija Zborovska’s interview with Andrii Dakhniy

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15407/fd2020.01.080

Abstract

The work of Martin Heidegger, both in the twentieth and early twentieth centuries, remains the most debated in philosophical discourse, and looking at it through the lens of existential tradition opens up new frontiers for its understanding. This conversation, inspired by the interest in the anthropological issues of the two interlocutors, took place the day after the defense of the doctoral thesis of the historian of philosophy Andrew Dakhni in May 2019, which in itself became a momentous event for national philosophical thought.

Author Biographies

Xenija Zborovska

Candidate of Sciences in Philosophy,

Executive Secretary of the «Philosophical Thought» Journal,

H.S. Skovoroda Institute of Philosophy, National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine, 4, Triokhsviatytelska St., Kyiv, 01001

Andrii Dakhniy

Doctor of Sciences in Philosophy, Head of the Department of History of Philosophy, Ivan Franko National University of Lviv,

1, Universytetska St., Lviv, 79000

Downloads

Abstract views: 384

Published

2020-06-18

How to Cite

Zborovska, X., & Dakhniy, A. (2020). Martin Heidegger: embeddedness in tradition. Xenija Zborovska’s interview with Andrii Dakhniy. Filosofska Dumka, (1), 80–92. https://doi.org/10.15407/fd2020.01.080

Issue

No. 1 (2020): Philosophical thought

Section

INTERVIEW

Metrics

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

License

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

  • Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication.
  • Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
  • Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).