The normativity of philosophical discourse: pro et contra
The "Philosophical Thought" Round Table
One of the main vocations of scientific communication is to find points of fruitful theoretical debate - those features of ideas, argumentation, established ideas that can become the source of new intellectual pursuits and conceptual assets. Acceptance of differences of positions, giving impulse to view too commonplace - that served as an impulse for raising the question of the normativity of philosophical discourse.
Abstract views: 376
How to Cite
Zborovska, X., & Proleev, S. (2020). The normativity of philosophical discourse: pro et contra: The "Philosophical Thought" Round Table. Filosofska Dumka, (5), 6–20. https://doi.org/10.15407/fd2019.05.006
TOPIC OF THE ISSUE
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).