EARLY ANCIENT PHILOSOPHERS: the beginning of European philosophical thought on the margins
Keywords:antique studies, early ancient philosophers, translator ethics
The article is devoted to the analysis of some trends in modern world antiquity and the re-actualization of issues that have methodological and ethical significance for researchers in this field. The essay is aimed not so much at building a broad argument for the "defense" of early ancient philosophers but at (re) actualizing those questions that should be answered by a historian of philosophy, translator, antiquarian, or more broadly - a researcher related to this field. . The author questions the place of the legacy of early ancient philosophers in the history of philosophy, as well as the ethics of "ranking" of more or less important philosophical doctrines. If we turn to the question of assessing (less) the value of the philosopher on the historical background, it remains open. It needs to be discussed soon because, without its clarification, there are no plans for translations and selection of authors for translation and research work in general. Areas will be unsystematic. Simultaneously, the birth of ancient philosophical thought ab initio is interesting precisely in its diversity, in the assortment of currents and approaches, in the pluralism of expressed ideas, because that is why almost every modern philosophical thesis can be justified with the help of an ancient heritage. After all, it is on such principles that specific steps can be outlined for building antiquity as a branch of Ukrainian science. That is why the author emphasizes the need for professional discussion of a range of issues that are basic for historical and philosophical science, which could clarify both the ethical dimension of the researcher and/or translator and the methodological direction of these studies, as well as affect the methodology of the thesaurus—key philosophical terms in Ukrainian. Addressing the origins of European philosophical thought is an urgent need of the Ukrainian community of philosophers because, without this field of research, the academic field cannot be complete.
Panych, O. (2012). State and prospects of Ukrainian antiquity. [In Ukrainian]. Philosophical Thought, 1, 5-25.
Rayhert, K. (2012). Johann Augustus Eberhard's "The Pre-Socratic philosophy". [In Russian]. Sententiae, 26 (1), 110-120. https://doi.org/10.22240/sent26.01.110
Curd, P., Graham, D.W. (Eds.) (2008). The Oxford Handbook of Presocratic Philosophy. S.l.: Oxford University Press.
Graham, D.W. (Ed., Tr.) (2010). The Texts of Early Greek Philosophy: The Complete Fragments and Selected Testimonies of the Major Presocratics (2 vols.). S.l.: Cambridge University Press.
Laks, A. (2018). The Concept of Presocratic Philosophy: Its Origin, Development, and Signifi- cance. S.l.: Princeton University Press.
McKirahan, R.D. (2011). Philosophy Before Socrates. An Introduction with Texts and Commentary (2nd ed.). S.l.: Hackett.
Sassi, M.M. (2018). The Beginnings of Philosophy in Greece. S.l.: Princeton University Press.
How to Cite
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).