PHILOSOPHY AS HOMESICKNESS: THE PROBLEM OF HOMELESSNESS IN THE PHILOSOPHY OF ROMANTICISM

YOUNG SCIENTIST 'S PAGE

Authors

Keywords:

romanticism, philosophy, art, hermeneutics, individuality, homelessness, Nietzsche, Heidegger, mythology, longing, secularization, modernity, modern age, poetry, language

Abstract

The article is dedicated to analyzing the theme of homelessness in the philosophy of Romanticism. In particular, it is based on a quote by Novalis, in which he says that “philosophy is, ultimately, a longing for home, a passionate desire to feel at home everywhere.” By analyzing this quote, the author concludes that the theme of longing for home is central to Romantic philosophy and continues into the 19th and 20th centuries. It is specifically shown that this theme not only reflected the general process of secularization in Europe but also demonstrated how the awareness of one’s own finitude can be perceived as an advantage. Novalis’s definition of philosophy as a “longing for home” is interpreted as an awareness of the problem of fundamental homelessness: being caught between the attempt to understand the world and the realization of the unattainability of this task. That is, between the attempt to know the world so deeply that one could unhesitatingly call it one’s own home, and the simultaneous impossibility of doing so. However, despite this interpretation of human life, the philosophy of Romanticism does not fall into the absolutization of fatalism. On the contrary, Romanticism sees uncertainty as a human advantage, the foundation of freedom: the ability to create new meanings, symbolic forms, and social practices, which makes historical movement possible at all.  This is achieved through the specific interpretation of philosophy, poetry and language that is proposed by the romantic movement. In this sense, it anticipates many of the trends in the history of thought that became popular starting in the second half of the 19th century. In particular, the theme of homelessness in this interpretation played a significant role in the philosophy of Friedrich Nietzsche and partially resonates with the ideas of thinkers such as Martin Heidegger and Richard Rorty. This encourages a return to the origins of this issue and a closer examination of what Romantic philosophy had to offer to the history of philosophy.

Author Biography

Artemii SMIRNOV

PhD Student, Department of Philosophy and Religious Studies, National University of Kyiv-Mohyla Academy, 2, Hryhorii Skovorody St., Kyiv 04070

References

Beiser, F.C. (2006). The Romantic Imperative: The Concept of Early German Romanticism. Harvard University Press.

Bowie, A. (1993). Schelling and Modern European Philosophy: An Introduction. Routledge.

Bowie, A. (2022). Aesthetic dimensions of modern philosophy. Oxford University Press.

Hamann, J.G. (2003). Aesthetica in nuce: rapsodiia v kabalistychnii prozi. [In Ukrainian]. In: L. Rudnytskyi & O. Feshovets (Eds.), Myslyteli nimetskoho romantyzmu (pp. 21–28). Lileia-NV.

Heidegger, M. (1997). Helderlin ta sutnist’ poezii. [In Ukrainian]. In: Teksty ta Pereklady / Ed. by T. Vozniak (pp. 345–363). Folio.

Heidegger, M. (2004). Die Grundbegriffe der Metaphysik: Welt – Endlichkeit – Einsamkeit (Wintersemester 1929/30) / Hrsg. von F.-W. von Herrmann. Vittorio Klostermann.

Heidegger, M. (1996). Erläuterungen zu Hölderlins Dichtung. Gesamtausgabe I. Bd. 4 / Hrsg. von F.-W. von Herrmann. Frankfurt am Main: Vittorio Klostermann.

Herder, J.G. (2003). Pro vplyv poetychnoho mystetstva na zvychai narodiv u stari ta novi chasy. [In Ukrainian]. In: L. Rudnytskyi & O. Feshovets (Eds.), Myslyteli nimetskoho romantyzmu (pp. 72–82). Lileia-NV.

Liutyi, T.V. (2024). Filosofiia nihilizmu Frydrykha Nitsshe u “Posmertnykh Frahmentakh” (1885–1888). Naukovi Zapysky NaUKMA. Filosofiia ta Relihiieznavstvo, 13, 45–56. https://doi.org/10.18523/2617-1678.2024.13.45-56

Nietzsche, F. (1988a). Kritische Studienausgabe. Bd. 4 / Hrsg. von G. Colli und M. Montinari. 2, durchgesehene Auflage. München: Deutscher Taschenbuch Verlag; Berlin; New York: Walter de Gruyter.

Nietzsche, F. (1988b). Kritische Studienausgabe. Bd. 6 / Hrsg. von G. Colli und M. Montinari. 2, durchgesehene Auflage. München: Deutscher Taschenbuch Verlag; Berlin; New York: Walter de Gruyter.

Novalis. (1965). Schriften: Die Werke Friedrich von Hardenbergs. Bd. II: Das philosophische Werk I (P. Kluckhohn & R. Samuel, Hrsg.). Kohlhammer.

Novalis. (1993). Das Allgemeine Brouillon: Materialien zur Enzyklopädistik 1798/99 (H.-J. Mähl, Hrsg.). Felix Meiner.

Novalis. (2003). Frahmenty. [In Ukrainian]. In: L. Rudnytskyi & O. Feshovets (Eds.), Myslyteli nimetskoho romantyzmu (pp. 324–336). Lileia-NV.

Smirnov, A. (2025). Bildung as infinite approximation: Clarifying the concept within the German Romantic tradition. [In Ukrainian]. NaUKMA Research Papers in Philosophy and Religious Studies, 16, 18—29. https://doi.org/10.18523/2617-1678.2025.16.18-29

Schlegel, A. (2003). Zahalnyi ohliad suchasnoho stanu nimetskoi literatury. [In Ukrainian]. In: L. Rudnytskyi & O. Feshovets (Eds.), Myslyteli nimetskoho romantyzmu (pp. 162–188). Lileia-NV.

Schlegel, F. (1963). Philosophische Lehrjahre (1796–1828) / Hrsg. von E. Behler. [Kritische Friedrich-Schlegel-Ausgabe. Bd. 18]. Ferdinand Schöningh.

Schlegel, F. (1967). Charakteristiken und Kritiken I (1796—1801) / Hrsg von H. Eichner [Kritische Friedrich-Schlegel-Ausgabe, Erste Abteilung: Kritische Neuausgabe. Bd. 2]. Ferdinand Schöningh.

Schubert, C. (2025). “Learn from artists” — Friedrich Nietzsche on the Art of Living. Sententiae, 44(1), 19–27. https://doi.org/10.31649/sent44.01.019

Shalahinov, B. (2020). Romantyky i modernisty. Narysy z istorii nimetskoi literatury ta estetyky ХІХ–ХХ stolit’. [In Ukrainian]. Kyiv-Mohyla Academy.

Taylor, C. (1992). Sources of the Self: The Making of the Modern Identity. Harvard University Press.

Yermolenko, V. (2022). Plynni ideolohii. [In Ukrainina]. Dukh i Litera.

Yevanheliie vid Ioanna. (2010). [In Ukrainian]. In: Bibliia / Trans by I. Ohiienko. Ukrainske Bibliine Tovarystvo.

Abstract views: 0

Published

2026-03-28

How to Cite

SMIRNOV, A. (2026). PHILOSOPHY AS HOMESICKNESS: THE PROBLEM OF HOMELESSNESS IN THE PHILOSOPHY OF ROMANTICISM: YOUNG SCIENTIST ’S PAGE. Filosofska Dumka, (1), 103–116. Retrieved from https://dumka.philosophy.ua/index.php/fd/article/view/884

Metrics

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.