Principle of objectivity and pragmatic-dialogic coherence of political statements
Keywords:
political statement, practical discourse, pragmatic-dialogic coherence, intersubjective objectivityAbstract
A principle of objectivity of social knowledge in correspondence with the paradigmal turn in philosophy that is in the context of practical discourse is substantiated in the article. This principle is considered in interrelation with the principle of pragmatic-dialogic, discourse coherence of social, and, in particular, political statements. This means that the fact of consistency of one or another thesis or intention with trustworthiness of recognition of speakers as partners in discourse is inevitable for determining objectivity of social statements. The agreement of the thesis or intention with the role of a partner of discourse is the last criterion for the argument significance and then a contribution to discourse, i.e. it is a principle of discoursive coherence, or intersubjective objectivity of corresponding statements. This principle is simultaneously a moral principle, since the practical discourse is also ethical, moral-practical category applied to different spheres of social being.
References
Apel K.-O. Das Apriori der Kommunikationsgemeinschaft und die Grundlagen der Ethik. Zum Problem einer rationalen Begründung der Ethik // Transformation der Philosophie. B.2. Das Apriori der Kommunikationsgemeinschaft. — Frankfurt a.M.: Suhrkamp,
1973. — S. 256 — 435.
Apel K.-O. Die transzendental-pragmatische Begründung der ethischen Grundnormen und іhr Verhältnis zu den kritisch-rekonstruktiven Sozialwissenschaften // Sprachtheorie und transzendentale Sprachpragmatik zur Frage ethischer Normen. Auseinandersetzungen in Erprobung des transzendentalpragmatischen Ansatzes. — Frankfurt a. M.: Suhrkamp, 1998.
Apel K.-O., Hösle V., Simon-Schaffer R. Die Tatsache der “Globalisierung” und die Aufgabe der Philosophie (Podiumsdiskussion) // Apel K.-O., Hösle V., Simon-Schaffer R. Globalisierung. Herausforderung für die Philosophie. — Bamberg: Universitäts-Verlag, 1998.
Böhler D. In dubio contra projectum. Mensch und Natur im Spannungsfeld von Verstehen, Konstruieren, Verantworten // Ethik für die Zukunft. Im Diskurs mit Hans Jonas. — München: Beck, 1994. — S.244 — 276.
Böhler D. Zukunftsverantwortung in globaler Perspektive. — Bad Homburg: VAS, 2009. — 115 S.
Downloads
-
PDF (Українська)
Downloads: 163
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
