Civil self-determination and civil ethos

SOCIAL PHILOSOPHY

  • Yevhen Muliarchuk
Keywords: civil society, civil self-determination, social identity, national community, culture, civilization, ethos, moral virtues

Abstract

Civil self-determination is analyzed in the article as a complex of social orientation and activities of people aimed on inter-personal and social benefits. Chief factors of civil con- sciousness forming were examined as well as contradictions and specificity of that process in Ukraine and contemporary world. Among the other forms of social identity civil self- determination is considered as determined by social norms and values, national culture as well as by universal ethical values.

The author develops the ethos approach to the analysis of civil society virtues formation and examines the complex of ethnic-national, social-political and civilizational factors of civil self-determination. In the discussion about national and civilizational grounds of civil self-determination the author takes up the position of universal civilizational values. The author considers self-determination in the society as a process of building of hierarchy of values spread from the values of freedom, self-actualization, pluralism, regarding of other citizens to responsibility of a personality for own community and for the whole mankind.

Author Biography

Yevhen Muliarchuk

Candidate of Philosophy, Senior Researcher at the Philosophy of Culture, Ethics and Aesthetics Department of the H. Skovoroda Institute of Philosophy NAS of Ukraine

References

Аrendt, H. (2002). The Origins of Totalitarianism. [In Ukrainian] Кyiv: Dukch i litera [= Арендт 2002]

Bukshtanovsky.V.I., Sogomonov U.V. (1991). Social-political process and civil ethos: the phe- nomenon of co-evolution. [In Russian] In: Sociological Studies, 7, 38–47. [= Бакшта- новский 1991]

Bukshtanovskyi,V.I., Sogomonov U.V. (2000). [In Russian] Middle-class ethos: normative model and domestic realia, Тumen. [= Бакштановский 2000]

Hegel, G.W.F. (1990). Philosophy of right. Мoscow: Mysl.

Civil identity and the sphere of civil activity in Russian Empire: second half ХІХ — beginning ХХ century

(2007). [In Russian] Мoscow: Russian political encyclopaedia (ROSSPEN). [= Civil 2007] National identity and civil society (2015). [In Ukrainian] Кyiv, Dukch i litera. [= National 2015] Pato ka, J. (2001). Negative Platonism; Eternity and historicity; Heretical Essays in the Philosophy

of History. [In Ukrainian] Кyiv: Оsnovy. [= Pato ka 2001]

Reznik, U.М. (2002). Social-cultural grounds of civil society. [In Russian] In: Civil society: origins

and modernity (pp. 123–188). [In Russian] Saint-Petersburgb: Juridicheskii Centr Press.

[= Резник 2002]

Habermas, U. (1995). Democracy. Reason. Morality. Мoscow lectures. [In Russian] Мoscow:

Academia. [= Хабермас 1995]

Published
2020-07-14
How to Cite
Muliarchuk, Y. (2020). Civil self-determination and civil ethos. Filosofska Dumka, (3), 79-89. Retrieved from https://dumka.philosophy.ua/index.php/fd/article/view/418