OVERVIEW OF MODERN PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE (art. 1)

PHILOSOPHICAL ISSUES OF NATURAL SCIENCE

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15407/fd2022.01.115

Keywords:

global/general and local/science-centered philosophies of sciences, features and classifi- cations of philosophies of mathematical and natural sciences, a network of specific theories as the core of the relevant science, practical theories and their reconstructions

Abstract

Varieties of modern philosophies of mathematical and natural sciences are represented. Specific features of those sciences are analyzed on the basis of graph classifications of the respective phi- losophies. The importance of reconstructions of practical theories is emphasized for all kinds of philosophies of science used by them.

The first part outlines the purpose of the article and considers subject and theoretical, the sec- ond — evaluative, nominal, theoretical-reconstructive and linguistic-reconstructive classifica- tions of philosophies of science. The conclusions are made about the problematic application of these classifications to the philosophies of social sciences and humanities.

Author Biographies

Oleksandr GABOVICH

Doctor of Sciences in Physics and Mathematics, Principal Research Fellow, Department of Crystal Physics,
Institute of Physics, NAS of Ukraine 46, Nauki Av., Kyiv, 03028 

Volodymyr KUZNETSOV

Doctor of Sciences in Philosophy, Professor, Principal Research Fellow, Department of Logic and Methodology of Science / Chair of Physic-Mathematical Disciplines, H.S. Skovoroda Institute of Philosophy, NAS of Ukraine / National University of “Kyiv-Mohyla Academy” 4, Triokhsviatytelska St., Kyiv, 01601

References

Belinskii, A.V. (2008). Quantum measurements. [In Russian]. Moscow: BINOM.

Belkind, L.D. (1968). André-Marie Ampère. 1775-1836. [In Russian]. Moscow: Nauka.

Dawkins, R. (2016). Reality magic. How science understands the Universe. [In Russian]. Moscow: AST.

Gabovich, A., Kuznetsov, V. (2013). Is there a Mr. Song we don't see? UFN Tribune. [In Russian]. Retrieved from: http://ufn.ru/tribune/trib122.pdf.

Gelfer, Ya., Liuboshits, V., Podgoretsky, M. (1975). The Gibbs paradox and the identity of particles in quantum mechanics. [In Russian]. Moscow: Nauka.

Imri, Y. (2002). Introduction to mesoscopic physics. [In Russian]. Moscow: Fizmatlit.

Kuznetsov, V. (1988). Understand that yoga model. [In Ukrainian]. Philosophical Thought, 1, 61-80.

Kuznetsov, V. (2014). Concept as a formative system of scientific knowledge. [In Ukrainian]. In: M. Popovych (Ed.), The World of Rationality as an Official of the European Integration of Ukraine (pp. 174-235). Kyiv: Naukova dumka.

Kuznetsov, V. (2018). Transformation of scientific theories as Umov's clerk for the development of science. [In Ukrainian]. In: Philosophical dialogues'2018. Be a human being (in memory of Miroslav Popovich) (pp. 30-48). Kyiv: H.S. Skovoroda Institute of Philosophy, NAS of Ukraine.

Pritz, W. (2020). Philosophical discussions about cosmology. [In Ukrainian]. Philosophical Thought, 3, 96-106.

https://doi.org/10.15407/fd2020.03.096

Pritz, V., Kuznetsov, V. (2020). Headlines of the cosmological picture of the world. [=In Uk- rainian]. Philosophical Thought, 2, 86-101.

https://doi.org/10.15407/fd2020.02.086

The standard of higher education in Ukraine of another (master's) level of knowledge 03 - Humanities for specialty 033 - Philosophy, approved by the order of the Ministry of Education and Science of Ukraine on 18.03.2021 No. 328 (2021). [In Ukrainian].

Trokhimchuk, R.M. (1998). Graph theory. [InUkrainian]. Kyiv: University of Kyiv.

Trubetskov, D.I. (2004). Introduction to synergetics. Chaos and structures. [In Ukrainian]. Mos- cow: URSS.

Fraser, D.D. (1986). Golden branch. The study of magic and religion. [In Russian]. Moscow: Politizdat.

Khlopov, M.Yu. (2004). Fundamentals of space microphysics. [InRussian]. Moscow: URSS.

Adriaans, P., van Benthem, J. (Eds.) (2008). Philosophy of Information, Amsterdam: North-Holland. Allchin, D. (2021). Who Speaks for Science? Science & Education. Retrieved from: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-021-00257-4.

https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-021-00257-4

Allhoff, F. (Ed.) (2010). Philosophies of the Sciences. A Guide. London, New York: Wiley-Blackwell.

https://doi.org/10.1002/9781444315578

Balashov, Y., Rosenberg, A. (Eds.) (2002). Philosophy of Science. Contemporary Readings. Lon-don, New York.

Balzer, W., Brendel, K.R. (2019). Theorie der Wissenschaften. Wiesbaden: Springer.

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-21222-3

Batterman, R. (Ed.) (2013). The Oxford Handbook of Philosophy of Physics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780195392043.001.0001

Bechtel, W. (1988). Philosophy of Science for Cognitive Science. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence ErlbaumAssociates.

Bernevig, B.A. (2013). Topological Insulators and Topological Superconductors. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

https://doi.org/10.1515/9781400846733

Bick, E., Steffen, F.D. (Eds.) (2005). Topology and Geometry in Physics. Lecture Notes in Physics (vol. 653). Heidelberg: Springer.

https://doi.org/10.1007/b100632

Botterill, G., Carruthers, P. (1999). The Philosophy of Psychology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511612428

Box, G.E.P. (1979). Robustness in the strategy of scientific model building. In: R.L. Launer, G.N. Wilkinson (Eds.). Robustness in Statistics (p. 202). New York: Academic Press.

https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-438150-6.50018-2

evic, A. (2021). Philosophy of Mathematics: Classic and Contemporary Studies. Boca Raton: CRC Press.

Crasnow, S., Intemann, K. (Eds.) (2021). The Routledge Handbook of Feminist Philosophy of Science. New York, London: Routledge.

https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429507731

Danto, A.C. (2006). Philosophy of science, Problems. In: D.M. Borchert (Ed.). Encyclopedia of Philosophy. In 9 Vols. (vol. 7, p. 516-521). Detroit: Thomson, Gale.

de Risi, V. (2007). Geometry and Monadology. Leibniz's Analysis Situs and Philosophy of Space. Basel: Birkäuser.

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-7643-7986-5

de Vries, M.J. (2016). Teaching about Technology. An Introduction to the Philosophy of Technology for Non-philosophers. Switzerland: Springer.

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-32945-1

Einstein, A. (1905). Zur Elektrodynamik der bewegter K rper. Ann. Phys., 17, 891-921.

https://doi.org/10.1002/andp.19053221004

Feigl, Р., Brodbeck, M. (Eds.) (1953). Readings in the Philosophy of Science. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.

Floridi, L. (2011). The Philosophy of Information. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199232383.001.0001

Fodor (1974). Special sciences. Synthese; 28 (2), 97-115.

https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00485230

French, S., Saatsi J. (Eds.) (2014). The Bloomsbury Companion to the Philosophy of Science. London, New York: Bloomsbury.

Gifford, F. (Ed.) (2011). Philosophy of Medicine. Amsterdam: North Holland.

https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-444-51787-6.50001-5

Hossack, K. (2020). Knowledge and the Philosophy of Number. What Numbers Are and How They Are Known. London: Bloomsbury.

https://doi.org/10.5040/9781350102934

Heidelberger, M., Stadler, F. (Eds.) (2002). History of Philosophy of Science. New Trends and Perspectives. Dordrecht: Springer.

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-1785-4

Hugly, P., Sayward, C. (2006). Arithmetic and Ontology. A Non-Realistic Philosophy of Arithmetic. Amsterdam, New York: Rodopi.

https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004333680

Husserl, E. (2003). Philosophy of Arithmetic. Psychological and Logical Investigations with Supplementary Texts from 1887-1901. Dordrecht: Springer.

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-0060-4

Johansson, L.-G. (2016). Philosophy of Science for Scientists. Cham: Springer.

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-26551-3

Jones, T.D. (2004). Special Sciences: still a flawed argument after all these years. Cognitive Science, 28, 409-432.

https://doi.org/10.1207/s15516709cog2803_5

Kampourakis, K. (Ed.) (2013). The Philosophy of Biology. A Companion for Educators. Dordrecht: Springer.

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-6537-5

Krömer, R. (2007). Tool and Object. A History and Philosophy of Category Theory. Basel: Birkäuser.

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-7643-7524-9

Kuznetsov, V. (1999). On the Triplet Frame for Concept Analysis. Theoria, 14 (34), 39-62.

Kuznetsov, V., Kuznetsova, E. (1998). Types of concept fuzziness. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 96 (2), 129-138.

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0165-0114(96)00269-2

Laplane, L., Mantovani, P., Adolphs, R., Chang, H., Mantovani, A., McFall-Ngai, M., Rovelli, C., Sober, E., Pradeu, T. (2019). Why science needs philosophy. PNAS, 116 (March 5), 3948-3952.

https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1900357116

Levin, J. (2002). Topology and the cosmic microwave background. Phys. Rep., 365 (4) 251-333.

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0370-1573(02)00018-2

Ludwig. D., Koskinen, I., Mncube, Z., Poliseli, L., Reyes-Galindo, L. (Eds.) (2021). Global Epistemologies and Philosophies of Science. London, New York: Routledge.

https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003027140

Marcum, J.A. (2008). An Introductory Philosophy of Medicine. Humanizing Modern Medicine. Dord recht: Springer.

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-6797-6

Marquis, J.-P. (2009). From a Geometrical Point of View. A Study of the History and Philosophy of Category Theory. Netherlands: Springer.

Matthews, M.R. (2014). Science Teaching. The Contribution of History and Philosophy of Science. 20th Anniversary Revised and Expanded Edition. New York, London: Routledge.

https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203123058

McIntyre, L., Rosenberg, A. (Eds.) (2016). The Routledge Companion to Philosophy of Social Science. London, New York: Routledge.

https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315410098

Mittelstraß, J. (Hrsg.) (2005-2018). Enzyklopädie Philosophie und Wissenschaftstheorie. 2, neubearbeitete und wesentlich ergänzte Auflage. In 8 Bänden. Stuttgart, Weimar: Metzler.

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-476-00134-4

Moulines, C.U. (2008). Die Entwicklung der modernen Wissenschaftstheorie (1890-2000). Einehistorische Einführung. Hamburg: Lit Verlag.

Newton-Smith, W.H. (Ed.) (2000). A Companion to the Philosophy of Science. Oxford: Blackwell.

https://doi.org/10.1111/b.9780631230205.2001.00056.x

Oreskes, N. (2019). Why Trust Science? Princeton, Oxford: Princeton University Press.

https://doi.org/10.1515/9780691189932

Papineau, D. (1995). Science, Problems of the Philosophy of. In: T. Honderich. The Oxford

Companion to Philosophy (pp. 809-812). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Pigliucci, М., Boudry, M. (Eds.) (2013). Philosophy of Pseudoscience. Reconsidering the Demarcation Problem. Chicago, London: The University of Chicago Press.

https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226051826.001.0001

Pitt, J.C. (2011). Doing Philosophy of Technology. Essays in a-Pragmatist Spirit. Dordrecht: Springer.

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-0820-4

Potter, M. (2000). Reason Nearest Kin. Philosophies of Arithmetic from Kant to Carnap. Oxford:Oxford University Press.

Potter, M. (2004). Set Theory and Its Philosophy. A Critical Introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199269730.001.0001

Preyer, G., Peter, G. (Eds.) (2008). Philosophy of Mathematics. Set Theory, Measuring Theories, and Nominalism. Frankfurt: Ontos.

https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110323689

Psillos, S. (2007). Philosophy of Science A-Z. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.

https://doi.org/10.1515/9780748629145

Pulte, H. (2018). Wissenschaftstheorie; Wissenschaftsphilosophie.. In: J. Ritter, K. Gründer,

https://doi.org/10.24894/HWPh.4888

G. Gabriel (Hrsg.) (2018), Historisches Wörterbuch der Philosophie online. Basel, Stuttgart: Schwabe.

Ricca, R. L., Berger, M. (1996). Topological ideas and fluid mechanics. Phys. Today, 49 (12), 28-34.

https://doi.org/10.1063/1.881574

Russell, B. (2018). Mysticism and Logic and Other Essays. London: George Allen & Unwin Lt.

Salmon, M.H., Earman, J., Glymour, C., Lennox, J.G., Machamer, P., McGuire, J.E., Norton, J.D., Salmon, W.C., Schaffner, K.F. (1992). Introduction to the Philosophy of Science. Indianapolis, Cambridge: Hackett Publishing Company.

Sarkar, S., Pfeifer, J. (Eds.) (2006). The Philosophy of Science. An Encyclopedia. New York, London: Routledge.

Shanker, S.G. (Ed.) (1996). Philosophy of Science, Logic and Mathematics in the 20th Century.

https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203063361

Routledge History of Philosophy. In 9 Vols. Vol. 9. London, New York: Routledge.

Shen, S.-Q. (2013). Topological Insulators. Dirac Equation in Condensed Matters. Berlin: Springer.

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-32858-9

Sklar, L. (1999). Philosophy of science. In: R. Audi (Ed.), The Cambridge Dictionary of Philosophy (pp. 700-704). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Smith, T.P. (2013). How Big is Big and How Small is Small. The Sizes of Everything and Why. New York: Oxford University Press.

Sober, E. (2002). Philosophy of Biology. Boulder: Westview Press.

Stemwedel, J. (2014). What is philosophy of science (and should scientists care). Scientific American

Blog Network. Retrieved from: html. https://blogs.scientificamerican.com/doing-good-sci-ence/what-is-philosophy-of-science-and-should-scientists-care.

Tanda, S., Matsuyama, T., Oda, M., Asano, Y., Yakubo, K. (Eds.) (2006). Topology in Ordered Phases. Singapore: World Scientific.

https://doi.org/10.1142/6221

Tiles, M. (1989). The Philosophy of Set Theory. An Historical Introduction to Cantor's Paradise. Mineola: Dover Publications.

Torretti, R. (1978). Philosophy of Geometry from Riemann to Poincare . Dordrecht: Reidel.

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-9909-1

Urton, G. (1997). The Social Life of Numbers. A Quechua Ontology of Numbers and Philosophy of Arithmetic. Austin: University of Texas Press.

Williamson, T. (2007). Philosophy of Philosophy. Malden, Blackwell.

https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470696675

Worrall, J. (1998). Science, philosophy of. In: Routledge Encyclopedia of Philosophy. London and New York: Taylor and Francis. Retrieved from: https://www.rep.routledge.com/articles/overview/science-philosophyof/v-1.

Zalta, E.N. (Ed.) (2021). Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Retrieved from: https://plato.stanford.edu/search/searcher.py?query=philosophy+of+science+

Downloads

Abstract views: 512

Published

2022-04-06

How to Cite

GABOVICH, O., & KUZNETSOV, V. (2022). OVERVIEW OF MODERN PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE (art. 1): PHILOSOPHICAL ISSUES OF NATURAL SCIENCE. Filosofska Dumka, (1), 115–133. https://doi.org/10.15407/fd2022.01.115

Issue

No. 1 (2022): Philosophical thought

Section

ARTICLES

Metrics

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

License

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

  • Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication.
  • Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
  • Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).