WAR AND PEACE AS MORAL IMPERATIVES OF MODERNITY

Authors

Keywords:

war, peace, global world, crisis of normativity, devaluation of values, state

Abstract

The article examines war and peace as dimensions of the existence of the global world. They outline the situation of civilizational choice, which will either enable the productive development of planetary humanity or lead humanity to catastrophe. War is defined as a fatal strategy, which has always had an extraordinary character despite the prevalence of the phenomenon of war. The fatality of war is determined doubly. First, by the fact that in the end all participants in the war lose: there are no winners in war, since participation in war destroys the potential for development. Second, by the fact that war generates human alienation and the destruction of normativity. This effect is revealed through the analysis of two processes of deformation of human existence: depopulation of man and devaluation of values. The basis for the answer to the question "how is modern war possible?" becomes the justification of the global crisis of normativity that is unfolding in global reality. Modern war has already acquired a global character, despite the fact that the theaters of military operations – in Ukraine and the Middle East – are still local. Its specificity is revealed through the challenge to three obvious facts of war, which are inherent in its customary understanding. The first obvious fact is the classical understanding of war as a political instrument (“the continuation of politics by violent means”). In contrast, it is argued that in certain historical periods, war can become an end in itself and become an established way of life for societies; we must be prepared for the fact that global humanity is now entering such a period. The second obvious fact is military actions themselves. However, the real basis of war is the growth of the role of violence in people's lives, which follows from the primacy of interests over values. The origin of war is the destruction and replacement of values ​​by interests. The third obvious fact is the consequences of war. These are not only undoubted destruction and death, but also the depopulation of man. Manic ideocratic regimes, retrograde strategies of globalism, and the state's struggle for its existence are highlighted as triggers of contemporary war.

Author Biography

Serhii PROLEIEV

Dr. Habilitated, Professor, Head of the Department of Philosophy of Culture, Ethics, and Aesthetics, H.S. Skovoroda Institute of Philosophy, National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine, 4, Triokhsviatytelska, Kyiv, 01001

References

Clausewitz, K. (2018). Die Natur des Krieges. [In Ukrainian]. Kharkiv: Vivat.

Economic Freedom in the World. (2024). Fraser Institute Report. [In Ukrainian]. Retrieved from: https://forbes.ua/news/ukraina-povernulasya-do-grupi-naybilsh-ekonomichno-nevilnikh-krain-zvit-institutu-freyzera-16102024-24204

International Military Tribunal (Nurenberg), Judgment of 1 October 1946. Retrieved from: https://crimeofaggression.info/documents/6/1946_Nuremberg_Judgement.pdf)

Kant, I. (2015). Zum ewigen Frieden. Ein philosophischer Entwurf. Berlin: Edition Holzinger.

Lorenz, K. (1983). Das sogenannte Bose: Zur Naturgeschichte der Aggression. München: Deutscher Taschenbuch Verlag.

Abstract views: 7

Published

2025-04-15

How to Cite

PROLEIEV, S. . (2025). WAR AND PEACE AS MORAL IMPERATIVES OF MODERNITY. Filosofska Dumka, (1), 82–97. Retrieved from https://dumka.philosophy.ua/index.php/fd/article/view/794

Issue

Section

TOPIC OF THE ISSUE

Metrics

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Most read articles by the same author(s)